<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382</id><updated>2012-01-26T16:25:52.073-05:00</updated><category term='Counsel Fees'/><category term='Child Support'/><category term='Heather Holsey Esq.'/><category term='Military Divorce'/><category term='Pleadings'/><category term='Child Custody'/><category term='Divorce in Maryland'/><category term='Financial Statements'/><category term='Grounds for Divorce'/><category term='Marital Property'/><category term='Alimony'/><title type='text'>Divorce in Maryland. Are You Confused Yet? Call For a Free Phone Consultation.</title><subtitle type='html'>1-888-760-7339. A guide to your understanding of Maryland divorce law from a Maryland Divorce Lawyer.Presented to you by The Law Offices Of KEITH BLAIR BARTNIK, P.A. 1-888-760-7339</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default?start-index=101&amp;max-results=100'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>101</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-1274259339319765030</id><published>2012-01-26T16:19:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-26T16:25:52.081-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Marital Property'/><title type='text'>Jointly titled reality in a divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>In cases that have been filed after October 1, 2006 while subject to the terms of any liens the court may transfer ownership of an interest in real property, which has been jointly owned by the parties when they lived together by &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(1) ordering the transfer of ownership or any interest in the ownership to the other party, if that party obtains the release of the other party from any liens. Or &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2) the court may authorize one party to purchase the other parties interested, provided everyone complies with the court's order and condition and terms. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You can find the statutory language for this court's ability to transfer ownership of property or a parties interested in ownership of property, provided there is a release of the mortgage. Or the court can authorize one party to buy out the other party on terms the court determines is appropriate. Family law article 8– 205. &lt;br /&gt;If you have questions regarding divorce in Maryland and the disposition of marital property in a divorce in Maryland please feel free to call me and I will discuss your case over the phone at no cost to you. 1-888-760-7339&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-1274259339319765030?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/' title='Jointly titled reality in a divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/1274259339319765030/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=1274259339319765030' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/1274259339319765030'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/1274259339319765030'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2012/01/jointly-titled-reality-in-divorce-in.html' title='Jointly titled reality in a divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-5039024408400126185</id><published>2012-01-24T16:26:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T16:33:17.478-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Grounds for Divorce'/><title type='text'>How to Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>Before you are eligible to file a complaint for divorce in Maryland you must first establish that you are a Maryland resident entitled to the benefit of Maryland court jurisdiction. The next step is to establish your grounds for divorce. There is a difference between an absolute divorce and the grounds associated with that type of divorce and a limited divorce and the grounds associated with that type of divorce. The grounds for limited divorce can be found in § 7-102. Limited divorce &lt;br /&gt;   &lt;br /&gt;(a) Grounds for limited divorce. -- The court may decree a limited divorce on the following grounds:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;   (1) cruelty of treatment of the complaining party or of a minor child of the complaining party;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;   (2) excessively vicious conduct to the complaining party or to a minor child of the complaining party;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;   (3) desertion; or&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;   (4) voluntary separation, if:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;      (i) the parties are living separate and apart without cohabitation; and&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;      (ii) there is no reasonable expectation of reconciliation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(b) Attempts at reconciliation. -- As a condition precedent to granting a decree of limited divorce, the court may:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;   (1) require the parties to participate in good faith in the efforts to achieve reconciliation that the court prescribes; and&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;   (2) assess the costs of any efforts to achieve reconciliation that the court prescribes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(c) Time during which decree is effective. -- The court may decree a divorce under this section for a limited time or for an indefinite time.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(d) Revocation of decree. -- The court that granted a decree of limited divorce may revoke the decree at any time on the joint application of the parties.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(e) Decree of limited divorce on prayer for absolute divorce. -- If an absolute divorce is prayed and the evidence is sufficient to entitle the parties to a limited divorce, but not to an absolute divorce, the court may decree a limited divorce.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The grounds for an absolute divorce can be found in § 7-103. Absolute divorce&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;   (a) Grounds for absolute divorce. -- The court may decree an absolute divorce on the following grounds:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;   (1) adultery;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;   (2) desertion, if:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;      (i) the desertion has continued for 12 months without interruption before the filing of the application for divorce;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;      (ii) the desertion is deliberate and final; and&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;      (iii) there is no reasonable expectation of reconciliation;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;   (3) conviction of a felony or misdemeanor in any state or in any court of the United States if before the filing of the application for divorce the defendant has:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;      (i) been sentenced to serve at least 3 years or an indeterminate sentence in a penal institution; and&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;      (ii) served 12 months of the sentence;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;   (4) 12-month separation, when the parties have lived separate and apart without cohabitation for 12 months without interruption before the filing of the application for divorce;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;   (5) insanity if:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;      (i) the insane spouse has been confined in a mental institution, hospital, or other similar institution for at least 3 years before the filing of the application for divorce;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;      (ii) the court determines from the testimony of at least 2 physicians who are competent in psychiatry that the insanity is incurable and there is no hope of recovery; and&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;      (iii) 1 of the parties has been a resident of this State for at least 2 years before the filing of the application for divorce;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;   (6) cruelty of treatment toward the complaining party or a minor child of the complaining party, if there is no reasonable expectation of reconciliation; or&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;   (7) excessively vicious conduct toward the complaining party or a minor child of the complaining party, if there is no reasonable expectation of reconciliation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(b) Recrimination. -- Recrimination is not a bar to either party obtaining an absolute divorce on the grounds set forth in subsection (a)(1) through (7) of this section, but is a factor to be considered by the court in a case involving the ground of adultery.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(c) Res judicata. -- Res judicata with respect to another ground under this section is not a bar to either party obtaining an absolute divorce on the ground of 12-month separation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(d) Condonation. -- Condonation is not an absolute bar to a decree of an absolute divorce on the ground of adultery, but is a factor to be considered by the court in determining whether the divorce should be decreed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(e) Effect of limited divorce on application for absolute divorce. --&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;   (1) A court may decree an absolute divorce even if a party has obtained a limited divorce.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;   (2) If a party obtained a limited divorce on the ground of desertion that at the time of the decree did not meet the requirements of subsection (a)(2) of this section, the party may obtain an absolute divorce on the ground of desertion when the desertion meets the requirements of subsection (a)(2) of this section.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you have questions regarding divorce in Marylan please feel free to call me at 1-888-760-7339. I am happy to answer your question and will do so right over the phone at no cost to you s&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-5039024408400126185?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/' title='How to Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/5039024408400126185/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=5039024408400126185' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/5039024408400126185'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/5039024408400126185'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2012/01/how-to-divorce-in-maryland.html' title='How to Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-7370317344133970905</id><published>2011-11-16T15:45:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2011-11-16T16:21:05.488-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Child Support in Maryland</title><content type='html'>Child-support in Maryland also addresses the issue of voluntary impoverishment. In the court's opinion Wills v Jones 340 Maryland 480 (1995) the court addressed the issue of voluntary impoverishment. The court determined;  whether a parent is voluntarily impoverished is a question only of whether the parent's impoverishment was voluntary. Examples are found in circumstances where a parent leaves a job to accept the position paying less. To the extent the decision was made voluntarily to leave the higher-paying job the parent is voluntarily impoverished. There is no need for the reduced pay to occur in conjunction with a desire to avoid child-support as a basis to establish voluntary impoverishment Goldberger v Goldberger. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Once it is established that the reduced pay is the product of a voluntary decision the only other next question revolves around the voluntarily impoverished parent's earning capacity or potential income. Prior earning history as well as vocational assessments are often times used to determine a parents earning capacity. The court looks at a number of factors in determining potential income including age; mental and physical condition; accident; educational background, special training or skills; prior earnings; efforts to find and retain employment; the status of the job market in the area where the parent resides; actual income and any other factor bearing on the parents ability to obtain funds for child support.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A parent is not excused from support because of a tolerance of or a desire for a frugal lifestyle. It has been noted by the court in Maryland that the individual's decision to move from his residence to a new residence where he earns less money is not the basis for voluntary impoverishment as it presents a unreasonable restriction on a person's ability to relocate Moore v Tseronis 664 A 2d 427. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you have questions regarding child-support in Maryland please feel free to give me a call at 1-888-760-7339.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-7370317344133970905?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/' title='Child Support in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/7370317344133970905/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=7370317344133970905' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7370317344133970905'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7370317344133970905'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/11/child-support-in-maryland_16.html' title='Child Support in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-9176444821799203195</id><published>2011-11-07T07:49:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2011-11-07T08:04:51.924-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Child Support in Maryland</title><content type='html'>Child-support in Maryland that section 12 – 202 provides that there is a rebuttable presumption that the amount of child support which would result from the application of the child support guidelines is the correct amount of child support to be awarded. The presumption however can be rebutted with evidence that shows that the application of the guidelines would be unjust or inappropriate. An example of the court application of this concept is found in the case of Horsley v Radisi 750 A 2d 692 (2000). Among other issues addressed in this case the court addressed the issue of extracurricular activities in the form of soccer camps, karate lessons, and violin lessons for a gifted and talented child as cost to be included in the child support calculations. The court differentiated between cost incurred for discretionary activities such as camps, music lessons, tutoring and gifted and talented programs versus expenses for remedial tutoring and gifted and talented educational programs. In pursuit of further clarification the court did not specifically exclude a deviation from the Maryland child-support guidelines to facilitate appropriate training for a child who excels in a particular area whether art, music or athletics with the caveat that the public schools cannot provide that appropriate training.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you have questions regarding child support in Maryland please feel free to give me a call at 1-888-760-7339. I will answer your questions over the phone at no cost to you.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-9176444821799203195?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/' title='Child Support in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/9176444821799203195/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=9176444821799203195' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/9176444821799203195'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/9176444821799203195'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/11/child-support-in-maryland.html' title='Child Support in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-6903849984558667379</id><published>2011-09-26T16:25:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2011-09-26T16:36:10.214-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Custody'/><title type='text'>Child Support Maryland</title><content type='html'>Child support in Maryland: by law parents are required to support a minor child through the age of 18, or until age 19, if the child is enrolled in secondary school. The obligation to support a minor child who is still attending secondary school until the age of 19 is a change from the prior law. You may find this change in Maryland annotated code article 1 section 24 Rules of Interpretation which creates an exception for child support and further family law article 5–203 says that parents are jointly and severally liable for child support, care, nurture, welfare and education. If you have the need to file a petition with the court to establish child-support in Maryland you are eligible to file the complaint in the county where the noncustodial spouse lives or works or where the child lives. It's important to remember when you file your complaint to establish child support you also have to file your &lt;a href="http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/"&gt;financial statement &lt;/a&gt;see Maryland rule 9–202. If you have questions regarding child-support in Maryland or any other matter involving divorce in Maryland please feel free to give me a call. I will answer your questions for you right over the phone at no cost to you 1-888-760-7339.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-6903849984558667379?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/' title='Child Support Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/6903849984558667379/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=6903849984558667379' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/6903849984558667379'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/6903849984558667379'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/09/child-support-maryland.html' title='Child Support Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-5833371772851670322</id><published>2011-09-22T09:18:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2011-09-22T12:39:37.243-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Divorce in Maryland'/><title type='text'>Divorce in Maryland Modification of Agreements</title><content type='html'>The court in a divorce in Maryland may modify any provision of the deed, agreement, or settlement with respect to the care, custody, education, or support of any minor child of the spouses, the modification would be in the best interest of the child. This language is found in Maryland family law article 8–103 that modification of the, agreement, or settlement. It is important to recognize that the court has the authority to change your agreement relative to custody visitation and child support. Too often I've seen parties except last or waive rights they could otherwise assert in exchange for consideration on visitation schedules. Only to find subsequently the other party has requested that the court modify the visitation schedule. When this happens you could very well find yourself having waived a property interest in exchange for a visitation schedule which is subsequently changed. This situation can be controlled in a separation agreement however it is an issue you must be aware of. If you have questions regarding divorce in Maryland were a separation agreement in Maryland please feel free to give me a call. I will answer your questions over the phone at no cost to you. 1-888-760-7339&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-5833371772851670322?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/index.html' title='Divorce in Maryland Modification of Agreements'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/5833371772851670322/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=5833371772851670322' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/5833371772851670322'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/5833371772851670322'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/09/divorce-in-maryland-modification-of.html' title='Divorce in Maryland Modification of Agreements'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-9092881569408914727</id><published>2011-09-21T15:34:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2011-09-21T15:39:46.203-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Child Support MD</title><content type='html'>Child-support in Maryland can be established by an initial pleading seeking child support from the other biological parent. Already existing child-support orders can be modified if there has been a material change of circumstances which would warrant a modification of the child support. In either of those cases the child support is retroactive back only to the date of filing. Additionally, I have represented clients who received child-support arrears back to the date of last payment when the payor parent failed to file a motion for modification when circumstances changed. That is an uncommon result which I would not expect to realize for my client had the payor spouse become disabled or unemployed through no fault of their own. If you have questions about child support in Maryland or any other issue involving divorce in Maryland please feel free to call my office we will discuss your case over the phone at no cost to you. 1-888-760-7339&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-9092881569408914727?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/' title='Child Support MD'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/9092881569408914727/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=9092881569408914727' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/9092881569408914727'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/9092881569408914727'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/09/child-support-md.html' title='Child Support MD'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-7188500722497063891</id><published>2011-09-14T13:54:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2011-09-14T14:05:22.550-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Child-support in Maryland</title><content type='html'>Voluntary impoverishment can be found in family law article 12 – 201 where it states if a parent is voluntarily impoverished child support may be calculated based upon the termination of potential income. However a determination of potential income may not be made for a parent who is unable to work because of a physical or mental disability or is caring for a child under the age of two from the parents are jointly and severally responsible. Voluntary impoverishment is generally found in a circumstance where a person has taken a reduction in salary to avoid his or her support obligations. As such it can be found in circumstances where an individual is working at less income than they have the ability to earn and it is done for the purpose of avoiding a child support obligation. It is rare that a parent would go to such extremes to avoid paying child support however I have seen those circumstances occur. Mainly I see those occasions arise where the paying spouse changes jobs frequently to avoid wage withholding liens. If you have questions on child support or any other matter involving child-support in Maryland please feel free to call me at 1-888-760-7339 I will answer your questions over the phone at no cost to you.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-7188500722497063891?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/' title='Child-support in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/7188500722497063891/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=7188500722497063891' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7188500722497063891'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7188500722497063891'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/09/child-support-in-maryland_14.html' title='Child-support in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-2556072791992090484</id><published>2011-09-12T11:38:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2011-09-12T11:48:15.631-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Child Support in a Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>School and transportation expense may be divided between the parents in proportion to their adjuste actual income. Family law article section 12–204 includes any expense for attending a special or private elementary or secondary school to meet the particular educational needs of the child or any expense for transportation of the child between the homes of the parent. "Particular educational needs" was defined in Witt v Ristaino 701 A2d 1227. The court held that the trial judge should consider a nonexhaustive list of factors when determining whether a child has a particular educational need. This would include the number of years the child has been in attendanc at the particular school. The child' performance while in the school, family history, parents choice, any particular factor that may impact upon the child's best interest and the parties ability to afford the private school education. If you have questions regarding divorce in Maryland please feel free to give me a cal I will answer your questions over the phone at no cost to you 1-888-760-7339.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-2556072791992090484?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/index.html' title='Child Support in a Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/2556072791992090484/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=2556072791992090484' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/2556072791992090484'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/2556072791992090484'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/09/child-support-in-divorce-in-maryland.html' title='Child Support in a Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-7781745350139333704</id><published>2011-09-10T13:03:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2011-09-10T13:09:07.469-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Custody'/><title type='text'>Divorce in Maryland children as witnesses</title><content type='html'>In a divorce in Maryland a judge is not required to interview a child in a custody case. If the court decides to interview a child it may be done without the presence of the parties and without the presence of counsel, even over the objections of either of the parties. The interview however must be reported by the court reporter unless the parties waive the recording requirement. Immediately following the interview the contents must be made known to counsel and the parties. Counsel for either party or even a best interest attorney is typically given the opportunity to suggest questions for the court to ask of the child the questions are typically submitted in writing. If you have questions regarding divorce in Maryland and or child custody in Maryland please feel free to give me a call. I will answer your questions for you right over the telephone at no cost to you. 1-888-760-7339&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-7781745350139333704?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/' title='Divorce in Maryland children as witnesses'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/7781745350139333704/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=7781745350139333704' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7781745350139333704'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7781745350139333704'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/09/divorce-in-maryland-children-as.html' title='Divorce in Maryland children as witnesses'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-308050469640305056</id><published>2011-09-08T07:51:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2011-09-08T12:45:31.079-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Divorce in Maryland'/><title type='text'>Domestic Violence in Maryland</title><content type='html'>The Maryland Domestic Violence Statute 4-501. Definitions "Abuse" means any of the following acts:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(i) an act that causes serious bodily harm;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(ii) an act that places a person eligible for relief in fear of imminent serious bodily harm;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(iii) assault in any degree;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(iv) rape or sexual offense under §§ 3-303 through 3-308 of the Criminal Law Article or attempted rape or sexual offense in any degree;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(v) false imprisonment; or&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(vi) stalking under § 3-802 of the Criminal Law Article.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(2) If the person for whom relief is sought is a child, "abuse" may also include abuse of a child, as defined in Title 5, Subtitle 7 of this article. Nothing in this subtitle shall be construed to prohibit reasonable punishment, including reasonable corporal punishment, in light of the age and condition of the child, from being performed by a parent or stepparent of the child.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(3) If the person for whom relief is sought is a vulnerable adult, "abuse" may also include abuse of a vulnerable adult, as defined in Title 14, Subtitle 1 of this article.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Child care provider (c) "Child care provider" means a person that provides supervision and care for a minor child.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cohabitant (d) "Cohabitant" means a person who has had a sexual relationship with the respondent and resided with the respondent in the home for a period of at least 90 days within 1 year before the filing of the petition.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Emergency family maintenance (g) "Emergency family maintenance" means a monetary award given to or for a person eligible for relief to whom the respondent has a duty of support under this article based on:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(1) the financial needs of the person eligible for relief; and&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(2) the resources available to the person eligible for relief and the respondent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Final protective order (h) "Final protective order" means a protective order issued under § 4-506 of this subtitle.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Home (i) "Home" means the property in this State that:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(1) is the principal residence of a person eligible for relief; and&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(2) is owned, rented, or leased by the person eligible for relief or respondent or, in a petition alleging child abuse or abuse of a vulnerable adult, an adult living in the home at the time of a proceeding under this subtitle.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Interim protective order (j) "Interim protective order" means an order that a Commissioner issues under this subtitle pending a hearing by a judge on a petition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Local department (k) "Local department" means the local department that has jurisdiction in the county:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(1) where the home is located; or&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(2) if different, where the abuse is alleged to have taken place.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Person eligible for relief (l) "Person eligible for relief" includes:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(1) the current or former spouse of the respondent;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(2) a cohabitant of the respondent;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(3) a person related to the respondent by blood, marriage, or adoption;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(4) a parent, stepparent, child, or stepchild of the respondent or the person eligible for relief who resides or resided with the respondent or person eligible for relief for at least 90 days within 1 year before the filing of the petition;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(5) a vulnerable adult; or&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(6) an individual who has a child in common with the respondent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Petitioner (m)(1) "Petitioner" means an individual who files a petition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(2) "Petitioner" includes: (i) a person eligible for relief; or (ii) the following persons who may seek relief from abuse on behalf of a minor or vulnerable adult:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. the State's Attorney for the county where the child or vulnerable adult lives, or, if different, where the abuse is alleged to have taken place;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. the department of social services that has jurisdiction in the county where the child or vulnerable adult lives, or, if different, where the abuse is alleged to have taken place;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. a person related to the child or vulnerable adult by blood, marriage, or adoption; or&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4. an adult who resides in the home.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Residence (n) "Residence" includes the yard, grounds, outbuildings, and common areas surrounding the residence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Respondent  (o) "Respondent" means the person alleged in the petition to have committed the abuse.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Temporary protective order (p) "Temporary protective order" means a protective order issued under §4-505 of this subtitle.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Victim (q) "Victim" includes a person eligible for relief.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Vulnerable adult (r) "Vulnerable adult" has the meaning provided in § 14-101(q) of this article.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please feel free to call me if you have any questions about domestoic voilenc ein Maryland I am happy to answer your questions over the phone and will do so at no cost to you 1-888-760-7339&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-308050469640305056?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Dom%20Violence.htm' title='Domestic Violence in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/308050469640305056/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=308050469640305056' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/308050469640305056'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/308050469640305056'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/09/domestic-violence-in-maryland.html' title='Domestic Violence in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-9025313721996731971</id><published>2011-09-07T15:50:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2011-09-07T16:03:34.043-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Divorce in Maryland'/><title type='text'>Settlement Agreement in Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>Many times the preferred way to resolve your divorce case is by agreement. Sometimes that is possible and sometimes it is not possible. However be cautious when entering into a separation agreement. Always have an attorney review the agreement prior to signing anything. I have repeatedly seen situations where parties unrepresented by attorneys enter into agreements which prove harmful in the long run. Many examples can be found. A situation for everyone to watch out occurs when parties naïvely waive interest in assets of definable value. This happens when one accepts benefits as child-support payments not otherwise due or subject to modification in exchange for a waiver of an interest in a tangible property interest. Incredibly I have seen that situation several times. If you have questions regarding a separation agreement relative to your divorce in Maryland please feel free to give me a call. I will answer your questions over the phone at no cost to you. 1-888-760-7339.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-9025313721996731971?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/' title='Settlement Agreement in Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/9025313721996731971/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=9025313721996731971' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/9025313721996731971'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/9025313721996731971'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/09/settlement-agreement-in-divorce-in.html' title='Settlement Agreement in Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-7949209118575596250</id><published>2011-09-06T15:36:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2011-09-06T15:43:05.608-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Child Support in Maryland</title><content type='html'>Child-support in Maryland utilizes a mathematical formula for calculating the noncustodial parents obligation to support the children. Income from both parties is calculated and adjusted for health insurance premiums incurred to benefit the children, daycare cost related to work, and in certain circumstances private school education are added to the child-support guidelines and the child-support obligation calculated. One other added factor to consider is the number of overnights when the children are with the otherwise noncustodial parent. Once the threshold of 128 overnights is realized the same factors as set forth above are plugged into the mathematical formula however the mathematical formula for determining child support in Maryland is itself changed. Often times having very dramatic impact on lowering the noncustodial parents child-support obligation. One other element to take into consideration are travel cost incurred to facilitate the visitation. Often times the court will entertain arguments that the child support amount should not be paid in full and a deviation should be allowed when the noncustodial parent lives so far away from the children that they incurs a cost that they cannot afford, along with child-support payments, to see the children. If you have questions on child-support in Maryland please feel free to call me I will discuss your case over the phone at no cost to you. 1-888-760-7339.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-7949209118575596250?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/index.html' title='Child Support in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/7949209118575596250/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=7949209118575596250' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7949209118575596250'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7949209118575596250'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/09/child-support-in-maryland.html' title='Child Support in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-61797652749111925</id><published>2011-09-01T16:23:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2011-09-01T16:30:02.550-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Pleadings'/><title type='text'>How to Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>Before you are eligible to file a complaint for absolute divorce in Maryland it is first necessary to establish the grounds for divorce. Once you have established that you are eligible to file the complaint for absolute divorce in Maryland you would file the complaint, information sheet and potentially a financial statement in the Circuit Court where either you reside or in the Circuit Court of the county where your spouse resides. The court will issue a summons for service on the spouse along with the information sheet, complaint and financial statement, if necessary. Upon service of the summons to your spouse they are then required to file an answer. If no answer is filed you would move forward to a default judgment. If an answer is filed the court will schedule a conference for all the parties to attend where appropriate court assets can be applied to the issues of the divorce case in an attempt to resolve the issues without litigation. If those measures are unsuccessful the case will proceed to a settlement conference. If the case cannot be resolved at the settlement conference a hearing date is scheduled for the parties to appear in court and present their evidence. There are a number of detours any given case can take depending upon the facts of those individual cases. If you have questions about your divorce in Maryland please feel free to call me. I am happy to answer your questions over the phone and will do so at no cost to you 1-888-760-7339&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-61797652749111925?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/index.html' title='How to Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/61797652749111925/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=61797652749111925' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/61797652749111925'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/61797652749111925'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/09/how-to-divorce-in-maryland.html' title='How to Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-4673352403181887451</id><published>2011-08-05T14:09:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2011-08-05T14:17:59.861-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Custody'/><title type='text'>Maryland Uniform Child Custody Act</title><content type='html'>The Maryland uniform child custody act can be found in the Maryland family law at section 9.5 – 201. The purpose of this blog entry is to point out the interplay between the uniform child custody act and section 9-302 of the Maryland family code annotated dealing with removal of children from the state. As well as section 9.5 – 207 which addresses the Maryland state courts ability to decline jurisdiction due to inconvenient forum. I recently completed a case where one of the parents had removed the children from Maryland in a clandestine manner. The noncustodial parent was completely unaware that the children had been removed from Maryland until nearly 7 months after their relocation. There was ample evidence to establish that the custodial parent never communicated the relocation to the noncustodial parent prior to that seven-month period of time expiring. Of course the custodial parent file for custody in his new jurisdiction in the noncustodial parent requested the court in Maryland to assume jurisdiction due to the wrongful taking and removal of the children from Maryland. Maryland case law on point suggest that while 9-302 supports the continuing jurisdiction of the custody issue be heard in Maryland ultimately the court's decision will properly rest on 9.5 – 207 wherein the court will make a determination as to which of the jurisdictions is most convenient. Factors have been outlined by the court for consideration. If you have questions about jurisdictional issues involving child custody please feel free to call me or visit my websitehttp://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/index.html . 1-888-760-7339&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-4673352403181887451?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/index.html' title='Maryland Uniform Child Custody Act'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/4673352403181887451/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=4673352403181887451' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/4673352403181887451'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/4673352403181887451'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/08/maryland-uniform-child-custody-act.html' title='Maryland Uniform Child Custody Act'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-3573149569070653303</id><published>2011-06-29T13:36:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2011-06-29T13:42:45.669-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Grounds for Divorce'/><title type='text'>How to Divorce in Maryland (part II)</title><content type='html'>This is the second installment on instructions regarding how to divorce in Maryland. As was stated in the prior post before you can file a complaint for absolute divorce in Maryland you must first establish your grounds for divorce. Maryland recognizes several grounds for divorce some more prevalent than others. I have outlined only those that are most common.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;An Absolute divorce in Maryland requires that you stay separate and aprt from your spouse for one year before you can file the complaint for absolute divorce. The only exceptions are if your spouse is committing adultery or treating you with excessively vicious conduct. The absolute divorce is the final divorce and addresses all the issues of the marriage, including, custody, visitation, child support, use and possession, alimony, equitable distribution of marital property and counsel fees. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The grounds available for an Absolute Divorce are: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Adultery; is defined as sexual intercourse with some one from the opposite sex that is not your spouse. It is proven by evidence of propensity to commit adultery and opportunity. A person who commits adultery can not be compelling to testify against themselves for any act occurring with in one year. Adultery can be proven my admission of the adulterous party only under circumstances where the case is hotly contested and there are no indications of collusion. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Desertion; your spouse left the marital home with the intention of ending the marriage and you and your spouse have remained separate and apart for one year and there is no hope you will ever get back together again. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Constructive Desertion: you left the marital home because your spouse made it impossible for you to continue living in the home with your health happiness and self respect intact. And you and your spouse have remained separate and apart for one year and there is no hope you will ever get back together again. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Excessively Vicious Conduct. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Voluntary Separation; you and your spouse agreed it was time to end the marriage and your spouse left the marital home. And you and your spouse have remained separate and apart for one year and there is no hope you will ever get back together again. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you have questions on how to divorce in Maryland or the grounds for divorce in Maryland or any other subject involving divorce in Maryland please feel free to give me a call I am happy to answer your questions over the phone and will do so at no cost to you. 1-888-760-7339.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-3573149569070653303?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/index.html' title='How to Divorce in Maryland (part II)'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/3573149569070653303/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=3573149569070653303' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3573149569070653303'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3573149569070653303'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/06/how-to-divorce-in-maryland-part-ii.html' title='How to Divorce in Maryland (part II)'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-3626463571751305042</id><published>2011-06-27T14:07:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2011-06-27T14:16:57.487-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Divorce in Maryland'/><title type='text'>How to Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>To answer the question of how to divorce in Maryland please appreciate there are procedures to be followed. In their simplest form it is necessary that you must establish your grounds for divorce. Once you have established the grounds for divorce you will file a complaint with the court attaching your longform or short form financial statement to the complaint for filing. The court will issue a summons and information sheet with instructions for you to attach your complaint and financial statement to the summons and information statement. At this point you must serve the summons, complaint and information statement on your spouse. Your spouse will then be required to file an answer. Once that task is completed the court will schedule a meeting at the court for a scheduling conference to set dates for additional court resources and other discovery related deadlines. As in all matters of the law there are several distinguishing requirements to be met not only in the drafting of your pleading but also in the service of the pleading and the time frames for the spouse to file his answer. If you have questions regarding any of these procedures please feel free to give me a call I am happy to answer your questions right over the phone and I will do so at no cost to you. 1-888-760-7339&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-3626463571751305042?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/index.html' title='How to Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/3626463571751305042/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=3626463571751305042' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3626463571751305042'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3626463571751305042'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/06/how-to-divorce-in-maryland.html' title='How to Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-4146192478317277243</id><published>2011-06-22T16:11:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2011-06-22T16:18:33.981-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Child Support Maryland Income Defined</title><content type='html'>In a Maryland child-support case the law has defined what income will be included in calculating the child support obligations. Below is an excerpt from that statute in Maryland law which defines income for child support purposes in a Maryland child support case.&lt;br /&gt;b)(1) "Actual income" means income from any source.(2) For income from self-employment, rent, royalties, proprietorship of a business, or joint ownership of a partnership or closely held corporation, "actual income" means gross receipts minus ordinary and necessary expenses required to produce income.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(3) "Actual income" includes:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(i) salaries;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(ii) wages;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(iii) commissions;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(iv) bonuses;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(v) dividend income;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(vi) pension income;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(vii) interest income;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(viii) trust income;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(ix) annuity income;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(x) Social Security benefits;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(xi) workers' compensation benefits;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(xii) unemployment insurance benefits;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(xiii) disability insurance benefits;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(xiv) for the obligor, any third party payment paid to or for a minor child as a result of the obligor's disability, retirement, or other compensable claim;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(xv) alimony or maintenance received; and&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(xvi) expense reimbursements or in-kind payments received by a parent in the course of employment, self-employment, or operation of a business to the extent the reimbursements or payments reduce the parent's personal living expenses.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(4) Based on the circumstances of the case, the court may consider the following items as actual income:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(i) severance pay;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(ii) capital gains;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(iii) gifts; or&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(iv) prizes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(5) "Actual income" does not include benefits received from means-tested public assistance programs, including temporary cash assistance, Supplemental Security Income, food stamps, and transitional emergency, medical, and housing assistance.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you have questions regarding child support in Maryland please feel free to give me a call at 1-888-760-7339. I am happy to answer your questions over the phone at no cost to you.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-4146192478317277243?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/index.html' title='Child Support Maryland Income Defined'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/4146192478317277243/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=4146192478317277243' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/4146192478317277243'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/4146192478317277243'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/06/child-support-maryland-income-defined.html' title='Child Support Maryland Income Defined'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-6091615004397801892</id><published>2011-06-21T15:46:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2011-06-21T15:55:33.865-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Child Support in MD</title><content type='html'>Child-support in Maryland is based upon a mathematical calculation that is outlined in the child support guidelines. It is essentially adding each spouse's gross income calculating the proportionate share of the income then calculating each parties financial obligation to pauy child support consistent with that percentage of contribution. Health insurance premiums are calculated in too adjusting the gross income. Child care costs are also calculated as well as uninsured health cost and education cost as they relate to, amoung other things, private schools. The court will allow deviations from the child support guidelines to facilitate visitations  if it is proven that it is in the children's best interest to reduce the child-support payment. One other additional major factor affecting the amount of the child support to be paid is the number of overnights when the children are with the otherwise noncustodial parent. Once the threshold of 128 overnights is reached the mathematical formula for calculating child support is modified for that shared physical custody arrangement. If you have questions regarding Maryland child-support or child-support arrears or divorce in Maryland please feel free to give me a call. I will answer your questions over the phone at no cost to you 1-888-760-7339.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-6091615004397801892?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/index.html' title='Child Support in MD'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/6091615004397801892/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=6091615004397801892' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/6091615004397801892'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/6091615004397801892'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/06/child-support-in-md.html' title='Child Support in MD'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-2018224324043497021</id><published>2011-06-20T15:36:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2011-06-20T15:44:28.464-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Grounds for Divorce'/><title type='text'>Adultery in a Maryland divorce</title><content type='html'>Adultery is one of the few grounds in the state of Maryland that will allow you to file a complaint for absolute divorce without waiting the one-year period of separation required by many of the other grounds for divorce that are available to you. I received many telephone calls every day from people asking if the e-mails and telephone messages between the offending spouse and the paramore are sufficient evidence of adultery. In order to prove adultery in the state of Maryland you must prove the offending spouse and the paramore have a disposition to commit the adultery and an opportunity to commit the offense. So yes the e-mails and text messages and the phone messages are important evidence. However proof of adultery is typically circumstantial evidence. In a divorce in Maryland adultery is required to be proven by a preponderance of the evidence. Opportunity requires some evidence that the offending spouse has been alone with the paramore that is enough to prove opportunity. If you have questions regarding divorce in Maryland please feel free to call me. I will answer your questions for you right over the phone. 1-888-760-7339&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-2018224324043497021?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/index.html' title='Adultery in a Maryland divorce'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/2018224324043497021/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=2018224324043497021' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/2018224324043497021'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/2018224324043497021'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/06/adultery-in-maryland-divorce.html' title='Adultery in a Maryland divorce'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-6026364396826893083</id><published>2011-06-19T10:20:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2011-06-19T10:30:41.637-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Custody'/><title type='text'>Uniform Child Custody Act Maryland</title><content type='html'>Circumstances arise where parties resident in different states have disputes over the custody of minor children. As a result of the problems most jurisdictions have adopted the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act. The Maryland statute is found in Maryland Family Law section 9.5–101 through 9.5–318. The implementation of the Act has eroded the concept of continuing jurisdiction over child custody issues. Particularly in those circumstances where a party is seeking a modification of a prior custody award and neither party resides in Maryland. In its simplest form the Act provides that the location which provides the most convenient forum for the court to determine the issue of custody in conjunction with the residents of the children for that six-month period of time immediately prior to filing the petition seeking custody shall be considered the home state. There are exceptions in emergency circumstances and in circumstances where the otherwise home state refuses to accept jurisdiction that Maryland will step in and decide issues for the parties. If you have questions regarding custody issues in a Maryland divorce please feel free to call me. I am happy to answer your questions right over the phone at no cost to you. 1-888-760-7339.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-6026364396826893083?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/' title='Uniform Child Custody Act Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/6026364396826893083/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=6026364396826893083' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/6026364396826893083'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/6026364396826893083'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/06/uniform-child-custody-act-maryland.html' title='Uniform Child Custody Act Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-3046838342467678723</id><published>2011-06-01T15:14:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2011-06-01T15:21:37.338-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Marital Property'/><title type='text'>Joint Property Statements in Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>In a divorce in Maryland a very valuable requirement is disclosure in the form 9-207it is the joint statement of property. I have attached the excerpts from the rules below.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;a) When required.- When a monetary award or other relief pursuant to Code, Family Law Article, § 8-205 is an issue, the parties shall file a joint statement listing all property owned by one or both of them. &lt;br /&gt;b) Form of property statement.- The joint statement shall be in substantially the following form: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;INSTRUCTIONS: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. If the parties do not agree about the title or value of any property, the parties shall set forth in the appropriate column a statement that the title or value is in dispute and each party's assertion as to how the property is titled or the fair market value. &lt;br /&gt;2. In listing property that the parties agree is non-marital because the property is directly traceable to any of the listed sources of non-marital property, the parties shall specify the source to which the property is traceable. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(c) Time for filing; procedure.- The joint statement shall be filed at least ten days before the scheduled trial date or by any earlier date fixed by the court. At least 30 days before the joint statement is due to be filed, each party shall prepare and serve on the other party a proposed statement in the form set forth in section (b) of this Rule. At least 15 days before the joint statement is due, the plaintiff shall sign and serve on the defendant for approval and signature a proposed joint statement that fairly reflects the positions of the parties. The defendant shall timely file the joint statement, which shall be signed by the defendant or shall be accompanied by a written statement of the specific reasons why the defendant did not sign. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(d) Sanctions.- If a party fails to comply with this Rule, the court, on motion or on its own initiative, may enter any orders in regard to the noncompliance that are just, including: &lt;br /&gt;(1) an order that property shall be classified as marital or non-marital in accordance with the statement filed by the complying party; &lt;br /&gt;2) an order refusing to allow the noncomplying party to oppose designated assertions on the complying party's statement filed pursuant to this Rule, or prohibiting the noncomplying party from introducing designated matters in evidence. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Instead of or in addition to any order, the court, after opportunity for hearing, shall require the noncomplying party or the attorney advising the noncompliance or both of them to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, caused by the noncompliance, unless the court finds that the noncompliance was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you have question on the joint statement of property, please feel free to call me to discuss. 1-888-760-7339. I will answer your questions at no cost to you right over the phone.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-3046838342467678723?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/index.html' title='Joint Property Statements in Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/3046838342467678723/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=3046838342467678723' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3046838342467678723'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3046838342467678723'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/06/joint-property-statements-in-divorce-in.html' title='Joint Property Statements in Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-118145396367073821</id><published>2011-05-31T07:23:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2011-05-31T07:29:08.602-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Custody'/><title type='text'>Joint Legal Custody In Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>Definition of Joint Custody as defined in Taylor v Taylor. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Embraced within the meaning of "custody" are the concepts of "legal" and "physical" custody. Legal custody carries with it the right and obligation to make long range decisions involving education, religious training, discipline, medical care, and other matters of major significance concerning the child's life and welfare. Joint legal custody means that both parents have an equal voice in making those decisions, and neither parent's rights are superior to the other.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you have questions on issues of joint legal custody divorce or personal injury in Maryland. Please feel free to call I will answer your questions over the phone at no cost to you. 1-888-760-7339&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-118145396367073821?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/index.html' title='Joint Legal Custody In Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/118145396367073821/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=118145396367073821' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/118145396367073821'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/118145396367073821'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/05/joint-legal-custody-in-divorce-in.html' title='Joint Legal Custody In Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-5345110394509810193</id><published>2011-03-14T13:06:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2011-03-14T13:17:48.958-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Custody'/><title type='text'>Uniform Child Custody Act Divorce In Maryland</title><content type='html'>The Uniform Child Custody Act among other things assist the court in deciding which of multiple different states may have jurisdiction to hear a custody action. The threshold typically is the children's residents for the 180 period of time immediately prior to a petition for custody being filed in that state. There are however circumstances where the 180 day threshold is of no force and effect to the then state of residence. For example, there are occasions where a spouse may secretively remove the children from the home state, establish new residency in another state, wait the 180 days, then file seeking custody. Maryland courts will not accept jurisdiction in a custody matter where the circumstances, giving rise to jurisdiction, involve wrongful taking, unjustifiable conduct, and are reprehensible conduct. Typically these are seeking off with the kids. If you have questions regarding jurisdiction or any other matter involving divorce in Maryland please feel free to give me a call 1-888-760-7339. I will answer your questions for you over the phone at no cost to you.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-5345110394509810193?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/index.html' title='Uniform Child Custody Act Divorce In Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/5345110394509810193/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=5345110394509810193' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/5345110394509810193'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/5345110394509810193'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/03/uniform-child-custody-act-divorce-in.html' title='Uniform Child Custody Act Divorce In Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-7744283500350040386</id><published>2011-03-11T13:44:00.005-05:00</published><updated>2011-03-11T13:56:09.757-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Divorce in Maryland Deviation from Child Support Guidelines</title><content type='html'>The law in Maryland does give the judge discretion to deviate from child support guidelines. The judge must explain why the deviation is in the child's best interest. However a deviation will often times be granted to facilitate vi station over distances to offset travel cost as an example. Also, if the non custodial spouse actually pays for after born children, they can also seek a deviation. The law likes to reward the person who pays child support whether court ordered or not. Ultimately the court can allow a deviation where is it justified to do so and in the child's best interest. If you have questions on &lt;a href="http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/"&gt;divorce in Maryland&lt;/a&gt; please feel free to call me. 1-888-760-7339.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-7744283500350040386?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://yourmarylandlawyer.com/' title='Divorce in Maryland Deviation from Child Support Guidelines'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/7744283500350040386/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=7744283500350040386' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7744283500350040386'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7744283500350040386'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/03/divorce-in-maryland-deviation-from.html' title='Divorce in Maryland Deviation from Child Support Guidelines'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-2522569546390720080</id><published>2011-03-09T11:24:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2011-03-09T12:41:52.130-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Child Support Extraordinary Medical Expenses</title><content type='html'>As part of the Maryland child support guidelines extraordinary medical expenses can be added to the monthly child support obligations as those costs are incurred. The definition of extraordinary medical expenses is found in the family Law article section 12-201. It means uninsured expenses over $100 for a single illness or condition it includes among other things, uninsured, reasonable, and necessary cost for dental, physical therapy treatment of chronic problems, professional counseling  psychiatric therapy for diagnosed mental disorder. Typically these costs are apportioned between the parties consistent with their income ratios. However I have seen many times where the court simply requires each party to pay 50%. Which is not a bad deal for the financially dominant former spouse. If you have questions regarding these issues or any other issues involving a Maryland divorce action or personal injury and malpractice in Maryland please feel free to call 1-888-760-7339&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-2522569546390720080?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/index.html' title='Child Support Extraordinary Medical Expenses'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/2522569546390720080/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=2522569546390720080' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/2522569546390720080'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/2522569546390720080'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/03/child-support-extraordinary-medical.html' title='Child Support Extraordinary Medical Expenses'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-6759680861871509096</id><published>2011-02-21T13:48:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2011-02-21T14:00:50.177-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Filing for Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>In Maryland you can be granted a Limited Divorce and/or an Absolute Divorce. A Limited Divorce is used to obtain the temporary relief sometimes needed immediately after separation. For example your spouse has left the home and is not paying toward rent, food, alimony, child support, etc., and you need money now. You can file for a limited divorce and you do not have to wait for the normal one year separation. You can file immediately. An Absolute divorce in Maryland requires that you stay separate and apart from your spouse for one year before you can file the complaint for absolute divorce. The only exceptions are if your spouse is committing adultery or treating you with excessively vicious conduct. The absolute divorce is the final divorce and addresses all the issues of the marriage, including, custody, visitation, child support, use and possession, alimony, equitable distribution of marital property and counsel fees. The initial steps to filing a divorce in Maryland are as follows: Initial pleadings, Information Sheet, Financial Statement and filing fee are filed with the court. The Initial pleading (complaint) will be outlining your grounds and prayer for relief. The Court issues a summons and returns the pleading back to you for service. You locate and serve your spouse (or you can pay and let the sheriff serve your spouse) with the pleading. Depending upon where your spouse is served (in state/out of state) they have 30 days to file an answer. If you have questions on these or any other issues regarding divorce in Maryland, please feel free to call me. I will discuss your case over the phone, at no cost to you. 1-88-760-733. If you prefer visit my web page &lt;a href="http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/"&gt;http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-6759680861871509096?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/' title='Filing for Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/6759680861871509096/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=6759680861871509096' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/6759680861871509096'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/6759680861871509096'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/02/filing-for-divorce-in-maryland.html' title='Filing for Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-2399496672529422735</id><published>2011-01-19T11:30:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2011-01-19T11:35:34.993-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Child Care Cost in Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>In a divorce in Maryland child support is based upon mandatory guidelines. One of the inclusions into the child-support calculation are actual childcare cost incurred by the custodial parent. The inclusion of childcare cost has a dramatic impact on increasing the amount of money to be paid by the noncustodial parent each month as payment. Below is outlined the Maryland statute on childcare expenses. As you will see the child care expense is properly included only where it is an actual costs incurred by the custodial parent due to employment or job search. As such if the custodial parent is incurring child care costs in pursuit of education or simply because they does not wish to keep an eye on the child every day the cost is not properly included in the child-support calculation. If you have any questions regarding child-support in a divorce in Maryland please feel free to give me a call at 1-888-760-7339. I am happy to answer your questions over the phone and will do so at no cost to you.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(g) Child care expenses.- &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3) of this subsection, actual child care expenses incurred on behalf of a child due to employment or job search of either parent shall be added to the basic obligation and shall be divided between the parents in proportion to their adjusted actual incomes. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(2) Child care expenses shall be: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(i) determined by actual family experience, unless the court determines that the actual family experience is not in the best interest of the child; or &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(ii) if there is no actual family experience or if the court determines that actual family experience is not in the best interest of the child: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. the level required to provide quality care from a licensed source; or &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. if the custodial parent chooses quality child care with an actual cost of an amount less than the level required to provide quality care from a licensed source, the actual cost of the child care expense. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(3) Additional child care expenses may be considered if a child has special needs.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-2399496672529422735?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/index.html' title='Child Care Cost in Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/2399496672529422735/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=2399496672529422735' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/2399496672529422735'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/2399496672529422735'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2011/01/child-care-cost-in-divorce-in-maryland.html' title='Child Care Cost in Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-7511915184993003736</id><published>2010-12-21T10:37:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2010-12-21T10:44:20.106-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Marital Property'/><title type='text'>Marital property Divorce In Maryland</title><content type='html'>The best way to understand marital property, in my opinion, is to view the issue as follows. Any and all value acquired during marriage is subject to an equitable distribution between the parties. It does not matter how the value is titled. If it is value acquired during marriage it is marital property. Once the court has determined what property is marital property the court then values that property and then the court makes a determination as to what is a fair and equitable distribution of that value. As you can imagine there are multiple areas of disagreement on the issues of marital property. I can tell you any divorce starts with the inventory of assets, liabilities, income, monthly expenses, and some opinion relative to what is in the children's best interest. If you have questions regarding martial property or divorce n Maryland please feel free to call me at 1-888-760-7339. I am more than happy to answer your questions over the phone at no cost to you.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-7511915184993003736?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/' title='Marital property Divorce In Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/7511915184993003736/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=7511915184993003736' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7511915184993003736'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7511915184993003736'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2010/12/marital-property-divorce-in-maryland.html' title='Marital property Divorce In Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-3314841888924513515</id><published>2010-12-20T13:06:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2010-12-20T13:21:51.360-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Divorce in Maryland'/><title type='text'>Settlement Agreements in Divorce In Maryland</title><content type='html'>In a divorce in Maryland the court will recognize the validity of a Settlement Agreement. The applicable Maryland statute on this subject can be found in the family Law article 8-101 and 8-102, which in pertinent part provides that a husband and wife may make a valid and enforceable agreement that relates to &lt;a href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Divorce%20Alimony.htm"&gt;alimony&lt;/a&gt;, support, property rights, or personal rights. And that such an agreement is not a bar to a divorce no matter when the agreement was executed. It is always advisable to have an attorney review any separation agreement prior to signing the separation agreement. Once the agreement is signed it is subject to the courts authority to enforce the agreement. It is not subject to modification on any issues other than, child custody, visation and child support. If you have questions regarding separation agreements or any other matter affecting divorce in Maryland please feel free to call me at 1-888-760-7339. I am more than happy to answer your questions over the phone at no cost to you.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-3314841888924513515?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com' title='Settlement Agreements in Divorce In Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/3314841888924513515/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=3314841888924513515' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3314841888924513515'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3314841888924513515'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2010/12/settlement-agreements-in-divorce-in.html' title='Settlement Agreements in Divorce In Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-6450410352568258655</id><published>2010-10-06T13:02:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-10-06T13:11:39.248-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Grounds for Divorce'/><title type='text'>Living Separate In a Maryland Divorce</title><content type='html'>Several people have called me in the past weeks asking whether they could file for a divorce against their spouse while they are still living under the same roof. Each has explained to me the financial difficulty of moving. You will find that Maryland has a public policy interest in people being married and remaining married. As such, absent the grounds of divorce of adultery and excessively vicious conduct, Maryland law does require that the parties remain separate and apart for one entire year plus a day before they are eligible to file a complaint for an &lt;a href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Divorce%20Grounds.htm"&gt;absolute divorce&lt;/a&gt;. It is possible to file a complaint for a limited divorce under constructive desertion while you are still living together with your spouse. This is only necessary to do if you have issues of custody or child support or alimony. Also just to mention it is not necessary to file papers with the court to prove that you are separated. You simply no longer live with your spouse and you are legally separated for purposes of divorce in Maryland.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you have questions on any issues regarding a divorce in Maryland please feel free to call me at 1-888-760-7339. I am happy to answer your questions for you over the phone at no cost to you.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-6450410352568258655?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Divorce%20Grounds.htm' title='Living Separate In a Maryland Divorce'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/6450410352568258655/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=6450410352568258655' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/6450410352568258655'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/6450410352568258655'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2010/10/living-separate-in-maryland-divorce.html' title='Living Separate In a Maryland Divorce'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-6941697081034655158</id><published>2010-08-31T13:51:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2010-08-31T14:11:20.158-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Custody'/><title type='text'>Grandparent Visitation Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>Maryland law on grandparent visitation has gone through many changes. Previously a grandparent simply have to petition for reasonable visitation with their grandchild. There were no preconditions to the visitation. The outcome of the trial was solely in the court's discretion and the court decision was guided solely upon determining what was in the child's best interest. See Maryland family law § 9-102. An equity court may:(1)consider a petition for reasonable visitation of a grandchild by a grandparent; and (2)if the court finds it to be in the best interests of the child, grant visitation rights to the grandparent. Case law in Maryland has had a very dramatic impact on section 9-102. It is important to note initially that both parents need to be made a party to the action. Presently a presumption in favor of the parents decision concerning visitation with a third party, including a grandparent, should be considered by the court. The third-party must demonstrate that there will be a current or future detriment to the child absent visitation with the third-party as a prerequisite for application of the best interests analysis.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you have questions regarding grandparent visitation or any other matter involving personal injury, medical malpractice or family law matters please feel free to call my office at 1-888-760-7339.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-6941697081034655158?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Divorce.htm' title='Grandparent Visitation Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/6941697081034655158/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=6941697081034655158' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/6941697081034655158'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/6941697081034655158'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2010/08/grandparent-visitation-divorce-in.html' title='Grandparent Visitation Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-5638511038867886054</id><published>2010-08-25T14:16:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-08-25T14:26:15.542-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Alimony'/><title type='text'>Alimony in a Maryland Divorce</title><content type='html'>There are a few issues involving alimony that may be of some interest. For example although court ordered alimony is always subject to modification however parties can specify in agreements that alimony payments are not subject to further court modification. Unless the parties agree in writing alimony will terminate upon remarriage. The circuit courts have an inherent power to award alimony and the power to reserve the issue of alimony. Alimony payents may retroactively applid to a time prior to the filing of a formal request for a modification of the alimony. Alimony is income to the recipient and a deduction to the payor. Generally speaking alimy is based upon a financial ability to pay alimony and a demonstrated financial need from the person who is seeking alimony.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you have questions on the issues involving a divorce in Maryland please feel free to call me at 1-888-760-7339. I am happy to answer your questions for you over the phone at no cost to you.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-5638511038867886054?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/' title='Alimony in a Maryland Divorce'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/5638511038867886054/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=5638511038867886054' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/5638511038867886054'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/5638511038867886054'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2010/08/alimony-in-maryland-divorce.html' title='Alimony in a Maryland Divorce'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-3722781873308051960</id><published>2010-08-24T13:41:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-08-24T13:50:16.503-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Divorce in Maryland'/><title type='text'>Settlement Agreements Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>There are generally two ways to resolve issues that arise in a divorce in Maryland. One is by agreement and the other is to let the court decide. Where possible it is preferred to resolve your issues by agreement. The benefits include controlling, to the extent possible, the outcome of your divorce and it is considerably less expensive than litigating the issues before the court. In the last week I have received several telephone calls from persons, that I was not representing, who have entered into separation agreements and almost immediately had second thoughts about the agreement and wanted to attack the agreement and set it aside. There are several ways to attack an agreement. However I will mention immediately that it is very difficult to attack an agreement and win. Some of the grounds available to attack an agreement include: duress and undue influence, lack of consideration, unjust or in equitable agreement, oppressiveness which shocks the conscience of the court, mutual misunderstanding, improper counseling, material fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and injustice and inequity.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you have questions regarding your divorce, a separation agreement, or any other matter involving divorce in Maryland please feel free to call me at 1-888-760-7339.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-3722781873308051960?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/' title='Settlement Agreements Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/3722781873308051960/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=3722781873308051960' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3722781873308051960'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3722781873308051960'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2010/08/settlement-agreements-divorce-in.html' title='Settlement Agreements Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-3063917628909061803</id><published>2010-08-22T10:47:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-08-22T11:00:36.905-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Child Support Overtime Income Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>As we have discussed child-support in Maryland uses mandatory guidelines to determine the amount of child support to be paid. A question often times arises as to what income is income for purposes of calculating the child-support. There are many issues to consider for example gifts, capital gains, income attributed to a parent and many many other issues. The purpose of this blog entry is to address solely the issue of &lt;a href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/index.html"&gt;overtime income&lt;/a&gt; for child-support purposes. The court of Special Appeals heard the case of Brown versus Brown and determined that actual income for purposes of determining child support payments is overtime income provided the income is not speculative or uncertain. As such, generally, it is determined that in order to include overtime income as income for child-support the overtime must be a regular part of the parents employment. Typically evidence of the earning history will prove this point. Often times it is necessary to subpoena someone from the payors employment to come to court and offer testimony on the issue of overtime availability. In the case of Johnson v. Johnson the court had the opportunity to visit the issue of a bonus as income for child-support purposes. This issue creates even greater complexity when considering modification delays and the inequity of overpaying in light of the fact that overpayment cannot be reimbursed see Barr versus Barr.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you have questions regarding Maryland child support please feel free to call me at 1-888-760-7339.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-3063917628909061803?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/index.html' title='Child Support Overtime Income Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/3063917628909061803/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=3063917628909061803' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3063917628909061803'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3063917628909061803'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2010/08/child-support-overtime-income-divorce.html' title='Child Support Overtime Income Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-1293492330088335238</id><published>2010-06-29T16:34:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-06-29T16:43:02.857-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Contempt in Divorce in Maryland Child Support</title><content type='html'>A child support order in a Maryland divorce action can be enforced by way of contempt. There is a statute of limitations on when the contempt proceeding must be initiated. § 10-102. Statute of limitations for contempt proceeding. A contempt proceeding for failure to make a payment of child or spousal support under a court order shall be brought within 3 years of the date that the payment of support became due. Under section Rule 15-207. Constructive contempt; further proceedings. Subsectio (2) Petitioner's burden of proof.- Subject to subsection (3) of this section, the court may make a finding of contempt if the petitioner proves by clear and convincing evidence that the alleged contemnor has not paid the amount owed, accounting from the effective date of the support order through the date of the contempt hearing. ) When a finding of contempt may not be made.- The court may not make a finding of contempt if the alleged contemnor proves by a preponderance of the evidence that (A) from the date of the support order through the date of the contempt hearing the alleged contemnor (i) never had the ability to pay more than the amount actually paid and (ii) made reasonable efforts to become or remain employed or otherwise lawfully obtain the funds necessary to make payment, or (B) enforcement by contempt is barred by limitations as to each unpaid spousal or child support payment for which the  alleged contemnor does not make the proof set forth in subsection (3) (A) of this section.  &lt;br /&gt;   &lt;br /&gt;As such the court only needs to find that there was an order in place that the order was not followed and the person obligated to follow the order had the ability to follow the order. In this circumstance the larger issue is the purge provision of the court's order finding contempt. The purge must be consistent with the contemptuous individuals ability to meet the purge provision.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-1293492330088335238?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/index.html' title='Contempt in Divorce in Maryland Child Support'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/1293492330088335238/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=1293492330088335238' title='23 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/1293492330088335238'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/1293492330088335238'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2010/06/contempt-in-divorce-in-maryland-child.html' title='Contempt in Divorce in Maryland Child Support'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>23</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-5985834627867279293</id><published>2010-06-16T13:53:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2010-06-16T14:02:48.874-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Custody'/><title type='text'>Use and Possession Affecting Stepchildren  Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>Use and possession in a divorce in Maryland involves the custodial parent having access to use the marital home or personal property acquired during the marriage for the benefit of the minor children in their custody. Often times an issue will arise as to whether or not a child is a child of the family. This occurs in a situation where there is a stepchild for example. Initially, a stepchild was found to be a child of the family the Court of Appeals in Maryland addressed the definition of child of the family to say a child of the family is the natural or adopted child of each of the parties to the divorce litigation. The statute does not include stepchildren within its scope. see Bledsoe 448 A2d 353 (1982).&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-5985834627867279293?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/' title='Use and Possession Affecting Stepchildren  Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/5985834627867279293/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=5985834627867279293' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/5985834627867279293'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/5985834627867279293'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2010/06/use-and-possession-affecting.html' title='Use and Possession Affecting Stepchildren  Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-5987854242282951113</id><published>2010-06-15T15:09:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2010-06-15T15:22:05.742-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Alimony'/><title type='text'>Alimony New Changes in Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>The Maryland courts have had the opportunity to consider the issue of whether guidelines as produced by computer programs should be considered by the judge when determining the issue of a person's eligibility for alimony and the duration of the alimony payments. The court addressed this issue in &lt;a href="http://mdcourts.gov/opinions/coa/2010/57a09.pdf"&gt;Thomas Boemio v. Cynthia Boemio &lt;/a&gt;. The court made clear in their decision that the statutory factors that have always been taken into consideration in determining alimony must still be consulted and must still be followed. However the statute does not preclude a judge from consulting with the computer calculated guidelines. I attended a recent settlement conference in Howard County and the settlement judge specifically requested both parties to submit computer calculated alimony guidelines. Sometimes the legal issues may be as simple as a mathematical formula. Sometimes maybe not. If you have questions regarding alimony in a Maryland divorce please feel free to give my office a call as I am more than happy to discuss those issues with you over the phone at no cost to you. 1-888-760-7339&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-5987854242282951113?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/index.html' title='Alimony New Changes in Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/5987854242282951113/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=5987854242282951113' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/5987854242282951113'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/5987854242282951113'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2010/06/alimony-new-changes-in-divorce-in.html' title='Alimony New Changes in Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-7387005298448729218</id><published>2010-05-17T14:11:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2010-05-17T14:27:12.579-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Enforcing Child Support in Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>If the court has entered an order requiring the noncustodial parent to pay child support and the noncustodial parent is able to pay the child support however refuses to pay the child support you can seek to enforce the Court's child support order by filing a petition for contempt. Rule 15-207 mandates the procedure to be followed in a civil contempt hearing. Subsection (e) focuses specifically on child or spousal support enforcement actions and provides that the alleged contemnor may be found in contempt upon a showing by clear and convincing evidence that he or she has not paid the amount owed. If the court makes a finding of contempt, it must issue an order specifying the amount of arrearage, the sanction, and how the contempt may be purged. Id. at 15-207(e)(4) (2001). The court may not make a finding of contempt, however, if the alleged contemnor proves that enforcement is barred by limitations or that he or she has never had the ability to pay despite his or her best efforts to obtain the funds necessary. Id. at 15-207(e)(3) (2001). In addition to the safeguards provided by Rule 15-207, the Court of Appeals has held that a court may not incarcerate a civil contemnor unless he or she has the to purge the contempt. As such there are actually two battlegrounds in any civil contempt proceeding. One is the initial finding of contempt and two is proof of the contemnor’s present ability to pay the amount of the purge provision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Pursuing enforcement of child support orders can be expensive for both parties. Often times the best way to proceed with ensuring that you are paid your child support is to have the child support paid through the Department of Child support enforcement by wage withholding order. Now when the noncustodial parent fails to pay the Department of Child support enforcement will go after him. If you have any questions please feel free to call me at 1-888-760-7339 or visit my website at www.yourmarylandlawyer.com&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-7387005298448729218?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/index.html' title='Enforcing Child Support in Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/7387005298448729218/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=7387005298448729218' title='6 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7387005298448729218'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7387005298448729218'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2010/05/enforcing-child-support-in-divorce-in.html' title='Enforcing Child Support in Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>6</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-1683397783540920924</id><published>2010-05-06T15:41:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2010-05-06T15:49:55.532-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Custody'/><title type='text'>Restrictions on Visitation Access in Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>Maryland has declared that a parent's interest in raising a child is a fundamental right that cannot be taken away unless clearly justified. In re Adoption, 103 Md. App 1, 12,651 A 2d 891, 894 (1994).  Juxtaposed against this fundamental right is the state's primary obligation to see to the protection of those who cannot protect themselves. Maryland courts have long recognized that under proper circumstances a Maryland court may restrict or deny visitation Painter v. Painter 113 Md. App. 504, 688 A.2d 479 (1997). &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;To restrict and control access the court must consider the appropriate factors, must make a specific finding of fact on the record stating the reason for its decision, and there must exist a nexus between contact with the parent and harm to the child. If no clear, direct connection is found, then the noncustodial parent's visitation rights cannot be restricted. Boswell v Boswell 118 Md. App. 1, 701 A 2d 1153 (1997), aff’d 352 Md 204, 721 A 2d 662 (1998). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Boswell, involving a homosexual father, the court focused on non marital sexual relationships affecting visitation restrictions. The restrictions therein prevented visits in the presence of specified persons and at specified times.&lt;br /&gt;In Boswell, the reviewing court initially took note of the trial court's error. Specifically, the trial court failed to articulate any reason for restrictions on access other than what was characterized as the “inappropriateness” of the father’s homosexual relationship. Further the reviewing court took note of the trial court's failure to state on the record the manner in which the children would be harm by the father’s conduct. The court took particular note that the trial court could not have articulated any harmful effect, since there was no evidence to support such a finding. As such there was no showing that the restriction was necessary to prevent any adverse impact on the children. Clearly there was no nexus between conduct and an actual harm or potential harm.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Court ultimately declared, “restrictions on access cannot be based solely on speculation, inferences, or presumptions about the likelihood of harm unsupported by adequate evidence”. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Boswell Court recognized it is not necessary for a court to sit idly by and wait until a child is actually harmed before placing restrictions on visitation. However there must be sound evidence demonstrating that a child is likely to be harmed down the road. The need for a factual finding of harm to the child requires that the court focus on evidence-based factors and not on stereotypical presumptions of future harm. Therefore, before the court restricts the noncustodial parent’s visitation, it must make specific factual findings based on sound evidence in the record. If the court does not make these factual findings, instead basing its ruling on personal bias or stereotypical beliefs, then such findings may be clearly erroneous and the order may be reversed. In addition, if the trial court relies on abstract presumptions, rather than sound principles of law, and abuse of discretion may be found. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Maryland law has made clear restrictions on access cannot be based solely on speculation, inferences, or presumptions about the likelihood of harm unsupported by adequate evidence. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is erroneous fact finding and abuse of discretion to require supervised visitation as necessary to prevent a harm or potential harm that is not supported by sound fact finding. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When a Court is permitted to place restrictions or limitations on visitation they must be reasonable, and must bear a reasonable relationship to the harm they seek to prevent. An “abuse of discretion" is said to occur "where no reasonable person would take the view adopted by the [trial] court," when the ruling is "clearly untenable, unfairly depriving a litigant of a substantial right ……..." North v North 102 Md App. 1, 648 A 2d 1025 (1994).&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-1683397783540920924?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Divorce.htm' title='Restrictions on Visitation Access in Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/1683397783540920924/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=1683397783540920924' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/1683397783540920924'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/1683397783540920924'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2010/05/restrictions-on-visitation-access-in.html' title='Restrictions on Visitation Access in Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-4040964485023466762</id><published>2010-01-20T12:57:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-01-20T13:05:11.364-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Divorce in Maryland'/><title type='text'>How To File For Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>As an overview on how to file for divorce in Maryland is important to first verify that Maryland has jurisdiction in your case. One or the other of the parties must reside in Maryland for at least one year prior to filing a complaint for absolute divorce in Maryland. Once you are confident you have this jurisdictional issue resolved the process is fairly straightforward. You must identify which issues you will need the court to address. There is a finite list of issues to be dealt with in any &lt;a href="http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/"&gt;divorce in Maryland&lt;/a&gt;. You will file your complaint for absolute divorce in the county where your spouse lives or works or if you are a Maryland resident you may also file in the county where you live. You can secure the complaint forms at the circuit court in which ever of the counties or cities you will be filing. If you are seeking child support or alimony it will be necessary to file a financial statement with your complaint. Once you have filed the complaint the court will take approximately 2 weeks to process your paperwork and will return your paperwork to you with a summons. You then will have to serve your paperwork and the summons on your spouse. Once your spouse receives the paperwork and the summons, depending upon where they are served or reside, they will have a period of time to file an answer. If they should fail to file an answer you will asked the court to enter a default judgment against them. If you have questions about this process please feel free to give me a call I am happy to into your questions for you right over the phone at no cost to you 1-888-760-7339.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-4040964485023466762?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/' title='How To File For Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/4040964485023466762/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=4040964485023466762' title='9 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/4040964485023466762'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/4040964485023466762'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2010/01/how-to-file-for-divorce-in-maryland.html' title='How To File For Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>9</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-8004062876263081525</id><published>2010-01-14T15:48:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-01-14T15:55:22.360-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Child Support Arrears in Maryland</title><content type='html'>The Court of Appeals in Rosemann v. Salsbury, Clements, Bekman, Marder &amp; Adkins, LLC determined that personal injury recovery is exempt from attachment to pay child support arrears. The case originates when the payor spouse received settlement funds arising from her personal injury case. Her former husband and custodian of the minor children learned of her recovery and sought to attach the funds in support of a judgment he had received for child support arrears. The court determined that the former wife's personal injury recovery is exempt as moneys payable in the event of sickness, accident, personal injury, or death.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-8004062876263081525?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/' title='Child Support Arrears in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/8004062876263081525/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=8004062876263081525' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/8004062876263081525'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/8004062876263081525'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2010/01/child-support-arrears-in-maryland.html' title='Child Support Arrears in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-6012360671223626183</id><published>2010-01-04T12:05:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-01-04T12:13:23.282-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Child Support Overpayment Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>There are occasionally those situations where the payor spouse has made in overpayment of his child support obligation. For example, when incomes have changed and a motion for modification of the child support has been filed based upon that material change of financial circumstances however the hearing is not until several months later. In that circumstance the spouse who is paying the child support may be paying an amount in excess of what Maryland Child support guidelines might otherwise require. As such, it would seem to make sense that the spouse who has overpaid would be entitled to reimbursement for the overpayment. In a divorce in Maryland the spouse who has overpaid the child support amount is not entitled to restitution or reimbursement for the overpayment. The Maryland court addressed this issue in KRIKSTAN v. KRIKSTAN 90 Md.App. 462 601 A.2d 1127. Therein the Appellant complains that the court erred in ordering her to reimburse appellee for the overpayment of support. For several reasons the court determined that they need not address this issue at length. However, for the benefit of the court on remand, the court noted that appellee has "no right to restitution or recoupment following a modification of child support." Holbrook, 132 Md. App. at 70, 750 A.2d 724; see Tanis, 110 Md.App. at 570-71, 678 A.2d 88; Krikston, 90 Md.App. at 473, 601 A.2d 1127.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Barr v. Barr, 58 Md.App. 569, 588, 473 A.2d 1300 (1984), the court explained that child support is the obligation of a parent to a child, not to the other parent. Therefore, a parent who "overpays" has no absolute right to recoupment. The concern, of course, is that such a requirement ultimately could deprive the child of benefits already received.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-6012360671223626183?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/index.html' title='Child Support Overpayment Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/6012360671223626183/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=6012360671223626183' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/6012360671223626183'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/6012360671223626183'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2010/01/child-support-overpayment-divorce-in.html' title='Child Support Overpayment Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-7914958914088492842</id><published>2009-11-17T11:59:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-17T12:13:16.495-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Material Change of Financial Circumstances Child Support Maryland Divorce</title><content type='html'>Once the court has entered an order for child support that order is subject to future modification. Pursuant to Maryland Family Law Article section 12-104 the court may modify a child support award subsequent to the filing of a motion for modification and upon a showing of a "material" change of circumstances. However the court may not retroactively modify a child support award prior to the date of the filing of the motion for modification. This is a very important point not to miss. As soon as you have a material change in circumstances you must file your motion for modification. The change in circumstances may include things such as the child reaching age of majority, a change of the physical custody, a change of the visitation schedule to exceed 128 overnights per year or may include a change in the income of the parties. For example, if you lose your job file your motion for modification. In the case of Kierein 115 Md App 448 (1997) the court determined that the child support order can only be modify it if there has been a material change in circumstances, needs, and financial conditions of the parties from the period of time immediately preceding when the court last had an opportunity to consider the issue. What qualifies as a material change depends on the facts of each case. In these situations I suggest that my clients, through counsel, for a correspondence to the other party enclosing their income information with proof of income and asked the other side to do the same. The adjustment to the child support order can be done by consent between the parties provided of course the modification still complies with Maryland Child support guidelines. If you are not sure you are entitled to a modification that please feel free to call my office. 1-888-760-7339&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-7914958914088492842?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/index.html' title='Material Change of Financial Circumstances Child Support Maryland Divorce'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/7914958914088492842/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=7914958914088492842' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7914958914088492842'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7914958914088492842'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2009/11/material-change-of-financial.html' title='Material Change of Financial Circumstances Child Support Maryland Divorce'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-4454089861581147522</id><published>2009-11-16T10:21:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-16T10:23:53.775-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Marital Property'/><title type='text'>Dissipation of marital assets divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>“Dissipation may be found where one spouse uses marital property for his or her own benefit for a purpose unrelated to the marriage at a time where the marriage is undergoing an irreconcilable breakdown.” Sharp v. Sharp, 58 Md.App. 386, 401, 473 A.2d 499 (1984). We have defined dissipation as expending marital assets “for the principal purpose of reducing the funds available for equitable distribution.” Jeffcoat v. Jeffcoat, 102 Md.App. 301, 311, 649 A.2d 1137 (1994).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Whether the use of marital property to pay attorney's fees constitutes dissipation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the case of Allison v. Allison 160 Md.App. 331, 864 A.2d 191 the Court determined: As a policy matter, attorney's fees should generally be viewed as a legitimate expenditure of marital funds. Since the law permits divorce, the law should permit spouses to spend the funds necessary to pay for legal services in divorce proceedings. Divorcing spouses usually do not have their own separate funds to pay their lawyers, so a rule that condemns the use of marital funds for legal services simply does not make sense. The doctrine of dissipation was developed as a tool to prevent and remedy economic misconduct that could frustrate an equitable distribution of partnership assets. Expenditures for legal services cannot be fairly characterized as economic misconduct. On the contrary, it should be viewed as entirely appropriate for people facing marriage breakdown to obtain the legal advice and assistance needed to equitably distribute marital assets.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Furthermore, it wastes resources to require spouses either to seek court permission before spending marital funds to obtain legal assistance or to seek a preliminary award of fees rather than spending the money necessary to obtain counsel. The doctrine of dissipation should remain available, however, to provide an avenue for redress if one spouse spends an unnecessary or unreasonable amount of marital funds on legal fees.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-4454089861581147522?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/' title='Dissipation of marital assets divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/4454089861581147522/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=4454089861581147522' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/4454089861581147522'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/4454089861581147522'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2009/11/dissipation-of-marital-assets-divorce.html' title='Dissipation of marital assets divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-6380547227829251073</id><published>2009-11-12T12:40:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-12T12:54:06.738-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Divorce in Maryland'/><title type='text'>Defending Contempt in a Maryland Divorce</title><content type='html'>Whenever an individual violates a provision of a court order their actions may constitute constructive contempt of the court. Typically we frequently see these types of contempt actions when people fail to pay alimony, fail to pay child support, or fail to obey court orders regarding visitation. A proceeding for contempt must be filed in the same court that issued the order. Just the mention, the statute of limitations for filing a contempt proceeding for nonpayment of child support is three years see section 10-102 of the Family Law article. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My best advice first and foremost is to obey all court orders. However there are circumstances where people simply cannot abide by the court order. Circumstances where an individual is required to pay alimony or child support and has lost his job would be a perfect example of that type of circumstance. The argument that would be advanced to the court would illistate he did not have the ability to comply with the court's order through no fault of your own, he lost his job. The judge will not find you in contempt of court unless there is evidence that you willfully, intentionally disobeyed his order. If you can present evidence that you intended to abide by the order but circumstances occurred beyond your control that prevented you from obeying the order then you stand a very good chance of not being found in contempt.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-6380547227829251073?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/' title='Defending Contempt in a Maryland Divorce'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/6380547227829251073/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=6380547227829251073' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/6380547227829251073'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/6380547227829251073'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2009/11/defending-contempt-in-maryland-divorce.html' title='Defending Contempt in a Maryland Divorce'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-6540650297517104278</id><published>2009-11-11T16:35:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-11T16:46:19.338-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Custody'/><title type='text'>Siblings and Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>Ordinarily the best interest and welfare of the children of the same parents is best served by keeping them together to grow as brothers and sisters under the same roof. There is no presumption that the best interest of siblings is preserved by keeping the children together. However generally, Maryland divorce law frowns upon division of siblings. There are a number of cases in Maryland divorce law where the Court has determined that the living arrangement which separated the siblings was to remain in tact since the children were driving in that living arrangement. Davis v Davis 280 Md 119 (1977) is an example where the court upheld the division where the youngest child had resided for two years with the mother without her siblings and had adjusted well to that arrangement. In Byrce v Bryce again the court upheld the division of siblings where the 2 older children had been with the mother and the youngest remained with the father.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you ever have questions regarding, visitation, or custody or child support issues please feel free to give me a call I'm more than happy to answer your questions. 1-888-760-7339&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-6540650297517104278?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/' title='Siblings and Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/6540650297517104278/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=6540650297517104278' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/6540650297517104278'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/6540650297517104278'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2009/11/siblings-and-divorce-in-maryland.html' title='Siblings and Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-7505624811485952986</id><published>2009-11-10T13:19:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-10T13:23:24.128-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Divorce in Maryland'/><title type='text'>Venue Affecting Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>Venue refers to what city or county you can use to file your complaint. It is an important issue in divorce cases.It is important due to the pace of getting cases scheduled and the judge's particular orientation on custody issues. Generally as you will see below venue depends on residency and employment issues.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;MD Code, Courts and Judicial Proceedings, § 6-201&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;6-201. In general&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;(a) Subject to the provisions of §§ 6-202 and 6-203 of this subtitle and unless otherwise provided by law, a civil action shall be brought in a county where the defendant resides, carries on a regular business, is employed, or habitually engages in a vocation. In addition, a corporation also may be sued where it maintains its principal offices in the State.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(b) If there is more than one defendant, and there is no single venue applicable to all defendants, under subsection (a), all may be sued in a county in which any one of them could be sued, or in the county where the cause of action arose.&lt;br /&gt;§ 6-202. Additional actions&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;In addition to the venue provided in § 6-201 or § 6-203, the following actions may be brought in the indicated county:&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(1) Divorce -- Where the plaintiff resides;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-7505624811485952986?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/' title='Venue Affecting Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/7505624811485952986/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=7505624811485952986' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7505624811485952986'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7505624811485952986'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2009/11/venue-affecting-divorce-in-maryland.html' title='Venue Affecting Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-4635591402653040965</id><published>2009-10-20T09:43:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-10-20T11:01:58.416-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Marital Property'/><title type='text'>Marital Property and Exclusions in Maryland Divorce</title><content type='html'>When contemplating a divorce in Maryland, the question of "is it marital property" always seems to surface.  "Marital" and "nonmarital" are adjectives used to describe time or manner of acquisition by either or both spouses. These words have nothing to do with "ownership", possession, or who uses it most. When a dispute arises between the parties in a Maryland divorce, the court shall determine what is marital property. In a Maryland divorce marital property can result in a monetary award, and hence why this is a hot topic in most Maryland divorce cases. There are things that can be excluded from "marital property". They are, property that was aquired before marriage, any inheritance or gift from a third party, anything that the parties agree to upfront that will not be considered marital property by agreement. If you have any questions regarding a divorce in Maryland, please feel free to call my office.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-4635591402653040965?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net' title='Marital Property and Exclusions in Maryland Divorce'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/4635591402653040965/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=4635591402653040965' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/4635591402653040965'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/4635591402653040965'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2009/10/marital-property-and-exclusions-in.html' title='Marital Property and Exclusions in Maryland Divorce'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-3550888099807476166</id><published>2009-10-19T16:11:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-10-19T16:23:52.150-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Child Custody Modification Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>In a Maryland divorce the issues of child custody, visitation, child support, children's education, and alimony are always subject to further court modification. See family law article section 8-103. It is important to take note that modification of a prior award regarding custody and visitation issues will require proof that there has been a change of circumstances and that the modification being sought is in the child's best interest. Typically, you will find that courts are not anxious to change custody and visitation unless something is wrong with the current situation. It is one of those situations where if it ain't broke don't fix it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As to child support is important to know that aarrears for child support modification is only retroactive back to the date that you request the modification. And it once again you do need to prove a material change of financial circumstances to justify the modification of the prior child support amount. I've seen countless cases where the payor spouse has lost their job and child support enforcement is continuing to pursue them for a child support payment. If you lose your job go to the circuit court in the county that entered the child support order and file a motion to modify the child support. You can do this on your own. If you have any questions just give my office a call and we will point you in the right direction. 1-888-760-7339&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-3550888099807476166?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/' title='Child Custody Modification Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/3550888099807476166/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=3550888099807476166' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3550888099807476166'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3550888099807476166'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2009/10/child-custody-modification-divorce-in.html' title='Child Custody Modification Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-480380921532615413</id><published>2009-08-29T09:14:00.005-05:00</published><updated>2009-08-29T09:25:18.261-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Custody'/><title type='text'>Attorney appointed for child in Maryland divorce</title><content type='html'>In a Maryland divorce case provisions are made for the appointment of an attorney to represent a minor child if necessary. The rules that govern the appointment of an attorney to represent a minor child are found in Maryland rule 9-205.1. Generally there are three categories of classifications into which an attorney may fall in his or her representation of a minor child.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One such category is the child's best interest attorney. This attorney is appointed by the court and acts in the child's best interest without being bound by the child's directives.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Another category is the child's advocate attorney. This is a court appointed attorney who represents the child much like the attorney would represent an adult and acts in furtherance of the child's directives.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finally you have the child's privilege attorney. This is a court appointed attorney who is in the case for the purpose of either asserting or waiving the doctor patient privilege. This category of attorney was once known as the Nagle v Hooks attorney.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you have questions regarding these issues or any other matter affecting a divorce in Maryland. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please feel free to call my office&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-480380921532615413?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylanddivorcelawyer.com/' title='Attorney appointed for child in Maryland divorce'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/480380921532615413/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=480380921532615413' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/480380921532615413'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/480380921532615413'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2009/08/attorney-appointed-for-child-in.html' title='Attorney appointed for child in Maryland divorce'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-5734203639861905328</id><published>2009-08-26T15:59:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-08-26T16:08:35.033-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Statute of Limitations on Child Support in Maryland</title><content type='html'>I received many calls every day from people asking if there is a statute of limitations on enforcing child support orders. The most direct way to enforce a child support order is to file a petition for contempt. You should review the Maryland family law article section 10-102. If you decide to proceed in this manner, you have three years from the date of nonpayment to bring your contempt proceeding.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This three-year limitation only applies to contempt proceedings and does not apply to proceeding for judgment for child support arrears. In that case the statute of limitations is 12 years. You can review the case of Miller v. Miller, 70 Md. App 1 &lt;br /&gt;(1987. This same 12 year statute of limitations would apply to actions to recover a judgment for medical and dental expenses which a party was obligated to pay in a separation agreement incorporated into a judgment of divorce. Please review the &lt;br /&gt;O'Hearn case 337 Md 292 (1995).&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-5734203639861905328?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net' title='Statute of Limitations on Child Support in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/5734203639861905328/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=5734203639861905328' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/5734203639861905328'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/5734203639861905328'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2009/08/statute-of-limitations-on-child-support.html' title='Statute of Limitations on Child Support in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-3157711871130682856</id><published>2009-06-30T11:37:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2009-06-30T11:38:27.656-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Marital Property'/><title type='text'>Use and Possession of Property in Maryland</title><content type='html'>The court is permitted to order that one custodial spouse with a child has the right to possess and use the family home and family use property for a limited time, regardless of how the property is titled. A use and possession order may only be issued in limited circumstances such as part of a divorce or annulment proceeding, temporarily in a pendente lite proceeding, or as the result of a protective order for domestic violence. The court can only award use and possession to a spouse with custody of a natural or adopted child, not a step child. The court may allocate financial responsibility to either or both the parties concerning indebtedness or expenses on the property. This means that the party not granted use and possession may be required to pay all or part of the expenses. The party bearing this financial responsibility has a right to seek contribution.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-3157711871130682856?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net' title='Use and Possession of Property in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/3157711871130682856/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=3157711871130682856' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3157711871130682856'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3157711871130682856'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2009/06/use-and-possession-of-property-in.html' title='Use and Possession of Property in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-5542702451159146536</id><published>2009-06-30T11:35:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-06-30T11:37:22.900-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Marital Property'/><title type='text'>Qualified Domestic Relations Orders in Maryland</title><content type='html'>A Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) is an order by the court to modify the payee of a pension plan. The court has the power to transfer interests in pensions, retirement plans, profit-sharing, or deferred compensation. A QDRO must be prepared which meets the specific requirements outlined in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). A QDRO is a means for a spouse to claim an interest in a participant’s retirement benefits through a state court order enforceable under federal law. A QDRO must set forth the name and last known mailing address of the plan participant and the alternate payee, the amount or percentage of benefits going to the alternate payee, and the number of payments to which the plan applies. Benefits provided under a QDRO are considered income to the actual recipient.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-5542702451159146536?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net' title='Qualified Domestic Relations Orders in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/5542702451159146536/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=5542702451159146536' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/5542702451159146536'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/5542702451159146536'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2009/06/qualified-domestic-relations-orders-in.html' title='Qualified Domestic Relations Orders in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-1137122498547428016</id><published>2009-06-30T11:33:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-06-30T11:35:21.607-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Grounds for Divorce'/><title type='text'>Adultery as a Ground for Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>Adultery is voluntary sexual intercourse between a married party and someone other than the spouse of the married party.  The aggrieved spouse may file for an absolute divorce immediately on the ground of adultery without waiting for any separation time period to expire.  Adultery is difficult to prove because of its private nature, so circumstantial evidence is permissible.  This circumstantial evidence must show BOTH opportunity on the part of the defendant and paramour to commit adultery AND disposition to commit the adultery.  An example of disposition is public displays of affection between the paramour and the defendant.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-1137122498547428016?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net' title='Adultery as a Ground for Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/1137122498547428016/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=1137122498547428016' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/1137122498547428016'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/1137122498547428016'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2009/06/adultery-as-ground-for-divorce-in.html' title='Adultery as a Ground for Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-5079946134079972963</id><published>2009-06-02T07:24:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-06-02T07:31:55.735-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Grounds for Divorce'/><title type='text'>Proof Of Separation in a Maryland Divorce</title><content type='html'>Maryland requires the parties live separate and apart for one year &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_0" class="blsp-spelling-corrected"&gt;before&lt;/span&gt; they are eligible to file a complaint for &lt;a href="http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/"&gt;absolute divorce&lt;/a&gt; in all but two grounds for divorce. The exceptions being &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_1" class="blsp-spelling-corrected"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/Grounds.html"&gt;adultery&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; and excessively &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_2" class="blsp-spelling-corrected"&gt;vicious&lt;/span&gt; conduct. &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_3" class="blsp-spelling-corrected"&gt;Proof&lt;/span&gt; of this separation typically is some fact witness who says I know he/she moved on such a day because (fill in the blanks), &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_4" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;ie&lt;/span&gt;: I helped them move, they moved in with me, etc.. That same witness can also be used to offer the testimony that the separation has remained &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_5" class="blsp-spelling-corrected"&gt;continuous&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_6" class="blsp-spelling-corrected"&gt;uninterrupted&lt;/span&gt; for the entire 12 months. other evidence is also available for example post office mail &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_7" class="blsp-spelling-corrected"&gt;changes&lt;/span&gt;, driver license changes, leases, and any other evidence on point to show the date you and your &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_8" class="blsp-spelling-corrected"&gt;spouse&lt;/span&gt; separated.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-5079946134079972963?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/' title='Proof Of Separation in a Maryland Divorce'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/5079946134079972963/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=5079946134079972963' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/5079946134079972963'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/5079946134079972963'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2009/06/proof-of-separation-in-maryland-divorce.html' title='Proof Of Separation in a Maryland Divorce'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-8459458636657016647</id><published>2009-05-14T06:25:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-05-14T06:28:28.982-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Custody'/><title type='text'>Custody Rights in a Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>I receive many calls each day from parents asking what rights they have to the care and custody of their children. In a &lt;a href="http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/"&gt;divorce in Maryland&lt;/a&gt; each &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_0" class="blsp-spelling-corrected"&gt;parent&lt;/span&gt; has an equal right to the care and custody of their child until a court orders otherwise. See Maryland Family Law Statute 5-203&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The parents are the joint natural guardians of their minor child. &lt;br /&gt;(2) A parent is the sole natural guardian of the minor child if the other parent:&lt;br /&gt;(i) dies;&lt;br /&gt;(ii) abandons the family; or&lt;br /&gt;(iii) is incapable of acting as a parent.&lt;br /&gt;(1) are jointly and severally responsible for the child's support, care, nurture, welfare, and education; and&lt;br /&gt;(2) have the same powers and duties in relation to the child. (d)(1) If the parents live apart, a court may award custody of a minor child to either parent or joint custody to both parents. &lt;br /&gt;(2) Neither parent is presumed to have any right to custody that is superior to the right of the other parent.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-8459458636657016647?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/' title='Custody Rights in a Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/8459458636657016647/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=8459458636657016647' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/8459458636657016647'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/8459458636657016647'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2009/05/custody-rights-in-divorce-in-maryland.html' title='Custody Rights in a Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-5961525796729274135</id><published>2009-04-23T12:58:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-04-23T13:33:29.806-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Marital Property'/><title type='text'>How to Make Non Marital Property Marital</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/Property.html"&gt;Marital property&lt;/a&gt; in a divorce in Maryland is defined essentially as all value acquired during marriage. The definition excludes values existing before marriage, gifts received and inheritances of value. Even those values which appear non marital may be converted to marital property by the conduct of either of the parties. For example suppose wife owes a rental property before marriage. However, during marriage the husband works on the property to improve the property. In this example the value increased by the personal efforts of the husband become marital property. The same is true of marital income diverted to improve the property. The increased value attributed to the spending of marital income is now marital property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The trick to the uncovering of the marital property in any case is to first identify the property and work backwards to see how the present value was acquired. Title does not matter at all in the equation. Look to person efforts and financial contributions made by either party to the acquisition of the value.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-5961525796729274135?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net' title='How to Make Non Marital Property Marital'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/5961525796729274135/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=5961525796729274135' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/5961525796729274135'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/5961525796729274135'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2009/04/how-to-make-non-marital-property.html' title='How to Make Non Marital Property Marital'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-207990312953998024</id><published>2009-04-15T09:44:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2009-04-15T10:01:09.322-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Pleadings'/><title type='text'>A Sample Complaint for Absolute Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>This is a sample complaint for an absolute divorce in Maryland based upon a mutual and voluntary agreement to separate. There are several other grounds for divorce that you can plead. I am offering the sample only as a general outline. Your case may have difference facts and different prays for relief.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;IN THE &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_0" class="blsp-spelling-corrected"&gt;CIRCUIT&lt;/span&gt; COURT OF MARYLAND FOR &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_1" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&lt;/span&gt; COUNTY&lt;br /&gt;CASE NO.:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_2" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_3" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;xxxxxxxxxxxxxx&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_4" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;xxxxxxxxxxxxx&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*&lt;br /&gt;Plaintiff&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;v.&lt;br /&gt;*&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_5" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;xxxxxxxxxxxxx&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_6" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;xxxxxxxxxxxxx&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align="left"&gt;&lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_7" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;xxxxxxxxxxxxx&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="left"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="left"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Defendant&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;**********************************************&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;COMPLAINT FOR ABSOLUTE DIVORCE&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="left"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="left"&gt;&lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_8" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;XXXXXXXXXXXXX&lt;/span&gt; , Plaintiff, by Keith Blair &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_9" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;Bartnik&lt;/span&gt;, his/her attorney, respectfully represents unto Your Honor:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. That Plaintiff is an adult and is a resident of &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_10" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;XXXXXXX&lt;/span&gt; County, State of Maryland; that Defendant is an adult and is a resident of &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_11" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;XXXXXXXXX&lt;/span&gt; County, State of Maryland; that both parties have been residents of the State of Maryland for more than one (1) year prior to the filing of this Complaint. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="left"&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="left"&gt;2. That the parties were married in a &lt;a name="Text4"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;xxxxxxxxx ceremony on the &lt;a name="Text5"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;day of &lt;a name="Text6"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a name="Text7"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, in &lt;a name="Text8"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, State of Maryland, in accordance with the laws of that State.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. That &lt;a name="Text9"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_12" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;XXXXXXX&lt;/span&gt; children were born as a result of said marriage; namely, &lt;a name="Text10"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;br /&gt;that said children are in the care and custody of &lt;a name="Text11"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;xxxxxx . That &lt;a name="Text12"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;xxxxx is not a fit person to have custody of said children.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4. That the parties have acquired and accumulated property during their marriage&lt;br /&gt;to each other and is "marital property", the same not having been acquired by an inheritance or gift from a third party, and is not excluded by a valid agreement nor is it directly traceable to any of these sources.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;5. That the parties have acquired and accumulated marital debt during the&lt;br /&gt;marriage to each other and is "marital debt".&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;6. That there are no other suit and or cases involving these parties.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;7. That the parties are presently living separate and apart and have voluntarily lived separate and apart from one another without cohabitation from &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_13" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;XXXXXXXXX&lt;/span&gt; to the date of the filing of this Complaint; that said separation is beyond any reasonable expectation of reconciliation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;WHEREFORE, Plaintiff request the following relief:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That Plaintiff be granted an absolute divorce from the Defendant.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That Plaintiff be awarded temporary and/or permanent custody of the minor children of the parties.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That the Defendant be ordered to pay to the Plaintiff a reasonable sum for temporary and permanent child support and child care.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That the Defendant be ordered to pay the cost of health insurance for Plaintiff and&lt;br /&gt;the minor child(&lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_14" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;ren&lt;/span&gt;) of the parties.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That the Court determine the ownership of all personal property and real property regardless of how titled.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That the residence of the parties be declared a family home.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That the Plaintiff be granted a use and possession order of said family home for the benefit of the minor child(&lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_15" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;ren&lt;/span&gt;) both &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_16" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;pendente&lt;/span&gt; lite and for a period of not less than three years from the date of divorce.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That the Defendant be ordered to pay all or part of the mortgage payments/rent,&lt;br /&gt;all or any part of the indebtedness related to the property, the cost of any maintenance, insurance, assessments and taxes, and any other similar expenses in connection with the property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That the Defendant be restrained from entering upon the family home property in violation of the use and possession order.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That the furniture and furnishings in said residence be declared family use personal property both &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_17" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;pendente&lt;/span&gt; lite and for a period of not less than three years from the date of divorce.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That the family use car be declared family use personal property both&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_18" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;pendente&lt;/span&gt; lite and for a period of not less than three years from the date of divorce.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That the Defendant be ordered to pay to the Plaintiff &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_19" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;Pendente&lt;/span&gt; lite and permanent alimony.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That the Court make a determination of all marital property of the parties.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="left"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That the Court determine the value of all marital property of the parties.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That the Court make a monetary award to the Plaintiff after adjusting the parties'&lt;br /&gt;equities in the marital property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That such monetary award in favor of Plaintiff be reduced to a judgment together with interest in Plaintiff’s favor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That the Court order a sale in lieu of partition of all real and person property&lt;br /&gt;determined to be jointly owned and not determined to be family home or family&lt;br /&gt;use personal property and divide the proceeds.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That the Defendant be enjoined from disposing of or otherwise encumbering any of the property marital property or property acquired during separation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That the Court order the real and personal marital property to constitute &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_20" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;lis&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_21" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;pendens&lt;/span&gt; with respect to all real and personal property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That the Defendant be ordered to pay to the Plaintiff suit money and court costs,&lt;br /&gt;including a reasonable contribution toward Plaintiff's attorney's fees in connection with&lt;br /&gt;legal services for the benefit of said child(&lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_22" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;ren&lt;/span&gt;) and attorney's fees for the Plaintiff, and&lt;br /&gt;that such order be reduced to Judgment in favor of Keith Blair &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_23" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;Bartnik&lt;/span&gt;, P.A..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That the Plaintiff be granted the use of her maiden name.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That the Court enter an Order as justice may require both &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_24" class="blsp-spelling-error"&gt;pendente&lt;/span&gt; and permanent&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That the Court grant such other and further relief as the Plaintiff’s cause may require.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;______________________________&lt;br /&gt;Plaintiff&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-207990312953998024?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/' title='A Sample Complaint for Absolute Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/207990312953998024/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=207990312953998024' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/207990312953998024'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/207990312953998024'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2009/04/sample-complaint-for-absolute-divorce.html' title='A Sample Complaint for Absolute Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-3930555010027062898</id><published>2009-04-15T09:33:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2009-04-15T09:44:36.006-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Pleadings'/><title type='text'>How To File For Divorce In Maryland</title><content type='html'>The very first step &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_0" class="blsp-spelling-corrected"&gt;before&lt;/span&gt; filing for divorce in &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_1" class="blsp-spelling-corrected"&gt;Maryland&lt;/span&gt; is to confirm you have the correct &lt;a href="http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/Jurisdiction.html"&gt;&lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_2" class="blsp-spelling-corrected"&gt;jurisdiction&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_3" class="blsp-spelling-corrected"&gt;Secondly&lt;/span&gt; you need to verify you have a &lt;a href="http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/Grounds.html"&gt;&lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_4" class="blsp-spelling-corrected"&gt;grounds&lt;/span&gt; for divorce&lt;/a&gt;. Once these are verified and you are confident you have the correct location (&lt;span id="SPELLING_ERROR_5" class="blsp-spelling-corrected"&gt;jurisdiction&lt;/span&gt;) and you have a grounds for divorce, then you are ready to draft the pleadings. The pleadings themselves are to follow specific outlines. The rules for pleadings are found in RULE 1-301. FORM OF COURT PAPERS. A pleading is to have&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Caption and Titling. Every pleading and paper filed shall contain a caption setting forth (1) the parties or, where appropriate, the matter, (2) the name of the court, (3) the assigned docket reference, and (4) a brief descriptive title of the pleading or paper which indicates its nature.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;An original pleading shall contain the names and addresses, including zip code, of all parties to the action if the names and addresses are known to the person filing the pleading. If the address of a party is unknown, the pleading shall so state.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regardless of the nature of the action, the party bringing an action shall be called the plaintiff and the party against whom the action is brought shall be called the defendant.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-3930555010027062898?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net/' title='How To File For Divorce In Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/3930555010027062898/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=3930555010027062898' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3930555010027062898'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3930555010027062898'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2009/04/how-to-file-for-divorce-in-maryland.html' title='How To File For Divorce In Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-1363585829757922569</id><published>2009-04-06T09:53:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-04-07T08:42:41.075-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Annulment in Maryland</title><content type='html'>Annulment is the legal determination that a marriage did not exist, as distinguished from divorce, which is a legal determination that a marriage existed, but is terminated. There are eight grounds for annulment in Maryland. These grounds include failure to have a license or a civil/religious ceremony, bigamy, consanguinity, age, insanity, intoxication, duress or fraud. If the facts of your situation do not fit in any of these grounds then your marriage must be terminated through the divorce process.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-1363585829757922569?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net' title='Annulment in Maryland'/><link rel='enclosure' type='' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net' length='0'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/1363585829757922569/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=1363585829757922569' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/1363585829757922569'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/1363585829757922569'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2009/04/annulement-in-maryland.html' title='Annulment in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-8640270297996769615</id><published>2009-04-06T09:51:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-04-06T09:53:37.103-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Setting Aside a Settlement Agreement in Maryland</title><content type='html'>Often times a Husband and Wife will enter into an Agreement relating to custody, visitation, child support, alimony, and property rights.  If approved by the Court, the Agreement will be enforced.  However the Court can refuse to enforce an Agreement using contract principles of law.  The Court will generally set aside an Agreement based upon three types of circumstances.  The first circumstance is unconscionability, which occurs when the terms contained within the Agreement are so inequitable and unjust as to “shock the conscience” of the Court.  The second circumstance is duress, where one side involuntarily accepted terms, had no alternative and did so because of coercive acts of the other.  The third and final circumstance is fraud, where an intent to deceive must be proven.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-8640270297996769615?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net' title='Setting Aside a Settlement Agreement in Maryland'/><link rel='enclosure' type='' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net' length='0'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/8640270297996769615/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=8640270297996769615' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/8640270297996769615'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/8640270297996769615'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2009/04/setting-aside-settlement-agreement-in.html' title='Setting Aside a Settlement Agreement in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-1734640763167959203</id><published>2009-02-24T14:17:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-02-24T14:27:25.857-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Custody'/><title type='text'>Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland</title><content type='html'>In Maryland the biological parent has rights to the care and custody of their child that are superior to any non biological persons. In fact in the event of a custody dispute the non biological party must prove the biological parent is unfit or there are exceptional circumstances affecting the best interest of the child as a threshold to the court ordering them to have custody. See Ross v Pick, 199 Md 341 86 A 2d 463 (1952). If you have encountered this situation where someone is trying to win custody over you for the care of your child, call me I am happy to discuss the case with you over the phone at no cost to you. 1-888-760-7339&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-1734640763167959203?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net' title='Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/1734640763167959203/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=1734640763167959203' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/1734640763167959203'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/1734640763167959203'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2009/02/child-custody-lawyer-in-maryland.html' title='Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-6356170514751237586</id><published>2009-02-24T12:17:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2009-02-24T12:25:31.674-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Marital Property'/><title type='text'>Talaq Divorce Not Recognized in Maryland</title><content type='html'>The Court of Appeals in Maryland had the opportunity to address the issue of a talaq divorce issued at the Pakistani embassy in DC. The case is reported in Aleem v Aleem 404 Md 404, 947 A 2d 489 (2008). The Maryland court determined in this instance that the Pakistani law permitting the divorce and subsequent property distribution was in conflict with Maryland public policy as that policy impacts property distribution. At issue was the husband's million dollar pension, which had the Maryland court not interceded would have remained his sole possession post the talaq divorce.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-6356170514751237586?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.divorceinmaryland.net' title='Talaq Divorce Not Recognized in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/6356170514751237586/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=6356170514751237586' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/6356170514751237586'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/6356170514751237586'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2009/02/talaq-divorce-not-recognized-in.html' title='Talaq Divorce Not Recognized in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-7561826620442815194</id><published>2009-02-19T12:03:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-02-19T12:05:54.915-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Driver’s license and Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>Can they really take my drivers license? The answer is yes.&lt;br /&gt;The Child Support Enforcement division may notify the Motor Vehicle Administration of any &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;obligor&lt;/span&gt; who is 60 days or more out of compliance with the most recent order of the court in making child support payments if:&lt;br /&gt;(i) the Administration has accepted an assignment of support under or&lt;br /&gt;(ii) the recipient of support payments has filed an application for support enforcement services with the Administration.&lt;br /&gt;Upon notification by the Administration under this subsection, the Motor Vehicle Administration:&lt;br /&gt;(i) shall suspend the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;obligor's&lt;/span&gt; license or privilege to drive in the State; and&lt;br /&gt;(ii) may issue a work-restricted license or work-restricted privilege to drive in the State.&lt;br /&gt;Conditions for reinstatement of &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;obligor's&lt;/span&gt; license&lt;br /&gt;If after information about an &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;obligor&lt;/span&gt; is supplied to the Motor Vehicle Administration the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;obligor's&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;arrearage&lt;/span&gt; is paid in full, the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;obligor&lt;/span&gt; has demonstrated good faith by paying the ordered amount of support for 6 consecutive months, or the Administration finds that one of the grounds exist the Administration shall notify the Motor Vehicle Administration to reinstate the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;obligor's&lt;/span&gt; license or privilege to drive.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-7561826620442815194?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/DV%20Child%20Support.htm' title='Driver’s license and Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/7561826620442815194/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=7561826620442815194' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7561826620442815194'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7561826620442815194'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2009/02/drivers-license-and-divorce-in-maryland.html' title='Driver’s license and Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-8986681366789427947</id><published>2009-02-19T11:59:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-02-19T12:01:35.596-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Material Change to Justify Modification of Child Support</title><content type='html'>There are some points of interest relative to child support modifications. If the child support was initially the result of a Court Order you can seek a modification upon a show of material change in financial circumstances. Generally any increase or decrease in the child support amount (not necessarily a decrease or increase in the income) that would increase or decrease the child support by 25% is a material change of financial circumstances.  If however the child support was arrived at by agreement between the parties and that agreement was later incorporated in the judgment of divorce, then the child support can be modified only upon the showing of (1) that the modification of the child support is in the child(ren) best interest and (2) that the new proposed child support figure is in the child(ren) best interest. I have located cases in Maryland where the Court has reduced the child support as it was in the kids best interest. Mostly the cases revolve around a changed circumstance of course and the impact of the change circumstances on the payer's ability to maintain visitation and or relationships with the children. Apparently Maryland will forgo money in exchange for fostering relationships and quality contact between parent and child.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-8986681366789427947?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/DV%20Child%20Support.htm' title='Material Change to Justify Modification of Child Support'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/8986681366789427947/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=8986681366789427947' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/8986681366789427947'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/8986681366789427947'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2009/02/material-change-to-justify-modification.html' title='Material Change to Justify Modification of Child Support'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-4132451026779015775</id><published>2009-02-18T14:44:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-02-18T14:54:16.145-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Child Support Modification in Maryland Divorce</title><content type='html'>I have been receiving several calls each day from non custodial parents who have unfortunately lost their employment in this recession. Each wants to know what they should do to change the child support obligation since they are no longer earning wages. It is important to note initially that the child support modification is retroactive only back to the date you seek a modification. This means you must file the motion to &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;modify&lt;/span&gt; child support &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;immediately&lt;/span&gt;. Once this is done I suggest a consent agreement. We &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;normally&lt;/span&gt; pursue this with a letter to the custodial spouse &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;outlining&lt;/span&gt; you are no longer employed. If unemployment is being pursued this is income for child support purposes. If there is no unemployment money and no other income and you are &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;actively&lt;/span&gt; trying to find a job then &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;unfortunately&lt;/span&gt; everyone suffers until new employment is secured. There is no point in everyone running to court to prove you are not working. The simplest solution is enter into a consent agreement with the agreement to share income information the minute you secure new &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;employment&lt;/span&gt;. At that point the child support can be &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;recalculated&lt;/span&gt; and the child support restarted as normal. If you &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;have&lt;/span&gt; any questions on child support issues, please visit my &lt;a href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/"&gt;web page&lt;/a&gt; or feel free to call me. 1-888-760-7339&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-4132451026779015775?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com' title='Child Support Modification in Maryland Divorce'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/4132451026779015775/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=4132451026779015775' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/4132451026779015775'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/4132451026779015775'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2009/02/child-support-modification-in-maryland.html' title='Child Support Modification in Maryland Divorce'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-5969664264216342138</id><published>2008-11-24T14:59:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2008-11-24T15:03:06.706-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Grounds for Divorce'/><title type='text'>Grounds for Divorce in Maryland Excesively Vicious Conduct</title><content type='html'>A little more &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;information&lt;/span&gt; on this grounds for divorce in Maryland. According to Family Law § 7-103 (a) (7) &amp;amp; (8) the Court may decree an absolute divorce based upon cruelty of treatment toward the complaining party or a minor child of the complaining party, if there is no reasonable hope of reconciliation or if there is excessively vicious conduct toward the complaining party or a minor child of the complaining party, if there is no reasonable expectation of reconciliation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Court defined excessively vicious conduct and cruelty in the matter of  &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;Das&lt;/span&gt; v. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Das&lt;/span&gt;, 133 Md. App. 1, 754 A.2d 441 (2000).  In &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Das&lt;/span&gt; the Court held in pertinent part that cruelty as a cause for divorce includes any conduct on the part of the husband or wife which is calculated to seriously impair the health or  permanently destroy the happiness of the other. As such the court continued any misconduct of a husband that endangers, or creates a reasonable apprehension that it will endanger, the wife's safety or health  to a degree rendering it physically or mentally impracticable for her to properly discharge the marital duties  constitutes cruelty within the meaning of the divorce statute.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-5969664264216342138?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com' title='Grounds for Divorce in Maryland Excesively Vicious Conduct'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/5969664264216342138/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=5969664264216342138' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/5969664264216342138'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/5969664264216342138'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2008/11/grounds-for-divorce-in-maryland.html' title='Grounds for Divorce in Maryland Excesively Vicious Conduct'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-8497089799842236834</id><published>2008-11-06T15:02:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2008-11-06T15:29:51.671-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Grounds for Divorce'/><title type='text'>Cruelty and Vicious Conduct as a ground for Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>A grounds for divorce in Maryland does include &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;cruelty&lt;/span&gt; or excessively &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;vicious&lt;/span&gt; conduct. The court's view point on this issue have &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;changed&lt;/span&gt; greatly over the years as to what type conduct will &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;justify&lt;/span&gt; the court granting an &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;absolute&lt;/span&gt; divorce.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The specific grounds for &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;absolute&lt;/span&gt; divorce on cruelty are found in  Family Law § 7-103 (a) (7) &amp;amp; (8) the Court may decree an absolute divorce based upon cruelty of treatment toward the complaining party or a minor child of the complaining party, if there is no reasonable hope of reconciliation or if there is excessively vicious conduct toward the complaining party or a minor child of the complaining party, if there is no reasonable expectation of reconciliation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Court has addressed this issue in the matter of  &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;Das&lt;/span&gt; v. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;Das&lt;/span&gt;, 133 Md. App. 1, 754 A.2d 441 (2000), therein the court found a basis for granting the absolute divorce on the grounds of cruelty and excessively vicious conduct. The case provides an excellent outline of the changing nature of the Court’s understanding of cruelty in today’s modern era of enlightenment. In &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;Das&lt;/span&gt; the court was persuaded most with the issuance of a protective order and wife’s stated health problems due to stress. The factual basis for granting an absolute divorce in &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"&gt;Das&lt;/span&gt; was further supported by evidence of the history of violence between Husband and Wife which justified entry of a one-year protective order in January 1998, and also noted this was   “one in several cases of domestic violence.” Further the court considered the Wife testimony that husband was “making me stay up all night in order to listen to him, isolating me from my friends and from my family, and not allowing contact as much as possible. Hitting, pinching, pulling hair, etc., were also noted to the point health problems, including cardiac arrhythmia brought on by the “stress of the marriage and the tensions at home.” Wife also spoke about her fear of Husband's taunting questions about what she might do when the protective order expired. The court also noted the fact that the police came to the house.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-8497089799842236834?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://yourmarylandlawyer.com' title='Cruelty and Vicious Conduct as a ground for Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/8497089799842236834/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=8497089799842236834' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/8497089799842236834'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/8497089799842236834'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2008/11/cruelty-and-vicious-conduct-as-ground.html' title='Cruelty and Vicious Conduct as a ground for Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-4457142568390374018</id><published>2008-10-05T05:33:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2008-10-05T05:45:20.200-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Military Divorce'/><title type='text'>Military Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>The military divorce in Maryland has some distinct difference from the civilian divorce in Maryland. Not that the law is different rather the issues are a bit more predictable in the military divorce. For example, the most common questions and conditions I encounter in the military divorce are jurisdiction, custody, what military benefits are included as income for child support purposes, the military pension, stay on litigation, and the 20/20/20 rule. What makes these issues more common place for &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;military&lt;/span&gt; divorce is the obvious situation where people are transient.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Maryland will exercise &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;jurisdiction&lt;/span&gt; in your divorce if you or your spouse have resided in &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Maryland&lt;/span&gt; for one year before filing for the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;divorce&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-4457142568390374018?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com' title='Military Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/4457142568390374018/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=4457142568390374018' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/4457142568390374018'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/4457142568390374018'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2008/10/military-divorce-in-maryland.html' title='Military Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-4639649048117048223</id><published>2008-10-03T16:02:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2008-10-03T16:07:39.573-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Custody'/><title type='text'>Modification Of Child Custody in Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;In a Divorce in Maryland even after the case is done and the judgment of divorce is final the Court still retains the jurisdiction and power to modify custody, child support and visitations. As to custody and visitation, these can be modified by the court on a petition for modification of custody and visitation filed in the jurisdiction where the child presently lives. This is true even if that is not the same location where the divorce decree was entered. However, in order to prevail on the petition for modification you must prove two things. First you must prove there has been a material change of circumstances. Second you must prove it is in the child's best interest to change custody. It is important to prove not just that things have changed like the child is older. Rather you have to prove things have changed in a material way. The court will not allow the non custodial parent to relitigate the same issues over and over see Schaefer v. Cusack 124 Md.App. 288, 722 A.2d 73 Md. App., 1998. As the Maryland divorce court said in Robinson v. Robinson, 328 Md. 507, 615 A.2d 1190 (1992), the primary concern to a judge in awarding custody to one parent over the other is the best interests of the child. The courts in a divorce in Maryland have repeatedly stated the list of factors:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;“For the purpose of ascertaining what is likely to be in the best interests and welfare of a child a court may properly consider, among other things, the fitness of the persons seeking custody, the adaptability of the prospective custodian to the task, the age, sex and health of the child, the physical, spiritual and moral well-being of the child, the environment and surroundings in which the child will be reared, the influences likely to be exerted on the child, and, if he or she is old enough to make a rational choice, the preference of the child. It stands to reason that the fitness of a person to have custody is of vital importance. The paramount consideration, however, is the general overall well-being of the child.”A change in circumstances has been required for a change of custody. In McCready v. McCready, 323 Md. 476, 593 A.2d 1128 (1991), Judge McAuliffe said for the Court the question of whether there has been a material change in circumstances which relates to the welfare of the child is, however, often of importance in a custody case. The desirability of maintaining stability in the life of a child is well recognized, and a change in custody may disturb that stability.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Stability is not, however, the sole reason for ordinarily requiring proof of a change in circumstances to justify a modification of an existing custody order. A litigious or disappointed parent must not be permitted to relitigate questions of custody endlessly upon the same facts, hoping to find a chancellor sympathetic to his or her claim.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;An order determining custody must be afforded some finality, even though it may subsequently be modified when changes so warrant to protect the best interest of the child. As we said in Hardisty v. Salerno, 255 Md. 436, 439, 258 A.2d 209 (1969), ‘while custody decrees are never final in Maryland, any reconsideration of a decree should emphasize changes in circumstances which have occurred subsequent to the last court hearing.’  See Sharp, Modification of Agreement-Based Custody Decrees: Unitary or Dual Standard?, 68 Va.L.Rev. 1263, 1266-71 (1982).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I customarily advise my clients, if you are seeking a change in custody things have to have changed. The court generally will not fix it if it is not broken. You have to prove the child is not doing well under the present living arraignments. For example, but not by way of limitation, the grades are slipping, the child is not socializing, not eating, not sleeping, digressing in behavior, the custodial parent is not caring for the child and all this is different then it was when the court originally entered their order. As such it is now in the child's best interest to change the custody.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-4639649048117048223?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylanddivorcelawyer.com' title='Modification Of Child Custody in Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/4639649048117048223/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=4639649048117048223' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/4639649048117048223'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/4639649048117048223'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2008/10/modification-of-child-custody-in.html' title='Modification Of Child Custody in Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-3760929513668837928</id><published>2008-09-26T11:58:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-09-26T11:59:55.752-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Heather Holsey Esq.'/><title type='text'>Divorce in Maryland: Alternative Means of Service of Process</title><content type='html'>After suit is filed in a divorce matter, service of process must be effected.  The purpose of service of process is to give actual notice to the defendant that an action against them has been instituted.  This is a due process requirement.  Generally this is done by delivering a copy of the summons, complaint, and all other papers filed to the individual, or by leaving a copy of the summons, complaint and all other papers filed at the individual’s dwelling house with a resident of suitable age and discretion, or by certified mail requesting restricted delivery.  Maryland Rule 2-121(a).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Occasionally I have represented clients who separated from their spouse years ago and do not know the current whereabouts of the spouse and are therefore unable to effect service of process.  When this occurs, a plaintiff spouse may petition the Court and request alternative means of service under Maryland Rule 2-121(c).  The Court will require an affidavit asserting good faith efforts to serve the defendant spouse were made pursuant to Maryland Rule 2-121(a) and have not succeeded. Other good faith efforts include publication of notice in newspaper, contacting friends and family members of the defendant spouse, retaining a private investigator and/or tracing companies, searches through social security, birth indexes, skip traces, and MVA records.  (Lohman v. Lohman, 331 Md. 113, 626 A.2d 384 Md., 1993.)(In re Thomas J., 132 Md. App. 396, 752 A.2d 699 Md. App., 2000.) &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please feel free to contact me at 1-888-760-7339 should you have any further questions.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-3760929513668837928?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='enclosure' type='' href='http://yourmarylandlawyer.com' length='0'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/3760929513668837928/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=3760929513668837928' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3760929513668837928'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3760929513668837928'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2008/09/divorce-in-maryland-alternative-means.html' title='Divorce in Maryland: Alternative Means of Service of Process'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-8017408603426147754</id><published>2008-09-25T06:23:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2008-09-25T06:30:53.735-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Grounds for Divorce'/><title type='text'>Limited Divorce vs Absolute Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>People call me all the time asking about these two different types of divorce in Maryland. The easiest way to understand the difference is to understand what each divorce type is trying to accomplish. The limited divorce is there to assist people with the issues to be resolved pending the grounds for absolute divorce maturing. So for example if you have children and/or the need for spousal support and you are separated from your spouse and they will not help you or they are fighting with you over the children for custody, then you can file for a limited divorce with out waiting for one year before you can file as required in the absolute divorce. The court will hear those temporary issues and decide on them more quickly with the limited divorce. You are still married with the limited divorce but these temporary issues are resolved. The absolute divorce by contrast is the final resolution of the marriage and address all the issues of your divorce on a permanent basis. Please feel free to call me if you have questions. I am happy to answer for you right over the phone 1-888-760-7339&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-8017408603426147754?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com' title='Limited Divorce vs Absolute Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/8017408603426147754/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=8017408603426147754' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/8017408603426147754'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/8017408603426147754'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2008/09/limited-divorce-vs-absolute-divorce-in.html' title='Limited Divorce vs Absolute Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-1192639499304295572</id><published>2008-09-23T08:37:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2008-09-26T11:58:06.069-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Heather Holsey Esq.'/><title type='text'>Divorce in Maryland:  The Issue of Commingled Funds</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-family:times new roman;"&gt;Any property that is acquired during the marriage that cannot be directly traced to a non-marital source is considered marital property. The party who asserts a marital property interest bears the burden of producing evidence of the identity and value of the property. Furthermore, the party attempting to demonstrate that property acquired during the marriage is non-marital must directly trace the property to a non-marital source. Noffsinger v. Noffsinger, 95 Md. App. 265, 620 A.2d 415 Md. App., 1993. Without further evidence or testimony, the mere fact that &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a name="SR;6503"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:times new roman;"&gt;non-marital funds &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a name="sp_162_424"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a name="SDU_424"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a name="citeas((Cite_as:_95_Md.App._265,_*284,_6"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a name="SR;6504"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:times new roman;"&gt;rested in the same account as &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a name="SR;6511"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:times new roman;"&gt;marital funds&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a name="SR;6512"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:times new roman;"&gt; does not compel the conclusion that the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a name="SR;6520"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:times new roman;"&gt;funds commingled&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a name="SR;6521"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a name="SR;6563"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:times new roman;"&gt;. The character of the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a name="SR;759"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:times new roman;"&gt;non-marital property may be preserved if its origins can be traced to&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a name="SR;771"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:times new roman;"&gt; non-marital property. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://web2.westlaw.com/find/default.wl?tf=-1&amp;amp;rs=WLW8.08&amp;amp;fn=_top&amp;amp;sv=Split&amp;amp;tc=-1&amp;amp;docname=MDFAS8-201&amp;amp;ordoc=2004700011&amp;amp;findtype=L&amp;amp;mt=Maryland&amp;amp;db=1000024&amp;amp;utid=%7bE2D79BFB-67F1-4F7C-8F51-C84275029436%7d&amp;amp;vr=2.0&amp;amp;rp=%2ffind%2fdefault.wl&amp;amp;sp=nu-2000" target="_top"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:times new roman;color:#000000;"&gt;West's Ann. Md. Code, Family Law, § 8-201(e)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:times new roman;color:#000000;"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-1192639499304295572?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='enclosure' type='' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com' length='0'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/1192639499304295572/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=1192639499304295572' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/1192639499304295572'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/1192639499304295572'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2008/09/divorce-in-maryland-issue-of-commingled.html' title='Divorce in Maryland:  The Issue of Commingled Funds'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-3280727933548971585</id><published>2008-09-23T06:02:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2008-09-23T06:13:38.553-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Grounds for Divorce'/><title type='text'>Grounds for Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>Once you confirm Maryland has jurisdiction over your divorce action you next move to the issue of whether you have grounds to seek a divorce in Maryland. There are &lt;a href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Divorce%20Grounds.htm"&gt;multiple grounds for divorce in Maryland.&lt;/a&gt; I am writing today only about those that are based on one year and a day separation. Each of these grounds require that you are separate and apart from your spouse for one year and one day before you can file the complaint for absolute divorce. There are two exceptions to this rule. One if your spouse is committing adultery and two if your spouse is treating you with excessively vicious conduct. The grounds that are available to you under the one year rule are desertion, constructive desertion and mutual and voluntary agreement to separate. Each requires this one year and one day separation for the entire year and a day, uninterrupted and continuously, without any hope of getting back together. Once you spearate you are legally separated. There is nothing to file with the court to make you more legally separated. Once you separate you have separated for purposes of the one year and a day requirements. If you have questions please feel free to call 1-888-760-7339.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-3280727933548971585?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com' title='Grounds for Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/3280727933548971585/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=3280727933548971585' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3280727933548971585'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3280727933548971585'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2008/09/grounds-for-divorce-in-maryland.html' title='Grounds for Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-125392420890537486</id><published>2008-09-22T12:47:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-09-22T12:50:07.700-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Divorce in Maryland Income Defined</title><content type='html'>For Maryland child support issues income is defined as follows:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(b)(1) "Actual income" means income from any source. &lt;br /&gt;(2) For income from self-employment, rent, royalties, proprietorship of a business, or joint ownership of a partnership or closely held corporation, "actual income" means gross receipts minus ordinary and necessary expenses required to produce income.&lt;br /&gt;(3) "Actual income" includes: (i) salaries; (ii) wages; (iii) commissions; (iv) bonuses; (v) dividend income; (vi) pension income; (vii) interest income; (viii) trust income; (ix) annuity income; (x) Social Security benefits; (xi) workers' compensation benefits; (xii) unemployment insurance benefits; (xiii) disability insurance benefits; (xiv) for the obligor, any third party payment paid to or for a minor child as a result of the obligor's disability, retirement, or other compensable claim; (xv) alimony or maintenance received; and (xvi) expense reimbursements or in-kind payments received by a parent in the course of employment, self-employment, or operation of a business to the extent the reimbursements or payments reduce the parent's personal living expenses&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-125392420890537486?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com' title='Divorce in Maryland Income Defined'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/125392420890537486/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=125392420890537486' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/125392420890537486'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/125392420890537486'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2008/09/divorce-in-maryland-income-defined.html' title='Divorce in Maryland Income Defined'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-7725828001946601633</id><published>2008-09-22T11:25:00.006-05:00</published><updated>2008-09-22T11:30:53.084-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Default Judgment and Child Support in Maryland Divorce</title><content type='html'>Occasionally I have a case where the plaintiff is the non custodial parent and seeks a divorce from the other. However, once served the custodial spouse fails to file any answer. As such naturally we move forward with the request to the court to enter a default judgment. Recently I have this very case. Once we arrived at the master's hearing on the default, as expected the issue of child support was addressed. Testimony before the master established my client's income and the custodial parents income was reduced to minimum wage as no one knew her income.  You will not divorce in Maryland with out child support being ordered.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-7725828001946601633?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com' title='Default Judgment and Child Support in Maryland Divorce'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/7725828001946601633/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=7725828001946601633' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7725828001946601633'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7725828001946601633'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2008/09/default-judgment-and-child-support-in.html' title='Default Judgment and Child Support in Maryland Divorce'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-4998995148665293482</id><published>2008-08-12T09:41:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-12T09:55:27.302-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Divorce in Maryland</title><content type='html'>In any divorce in Maryland the court will consider extraordinary medical expenses as part of the child support obligation. I receive several calls on this issue each week from people interested to know if braces are included. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;The&lt;/span&gt; answer is yes braces are included. So having said that, extraordinary medical expenses are defined: Extraordinary medical expenses&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a name="SDU_5"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a name="SP;4d690000c9482"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;(g)(1) "Extraordinary medical expenses" means uninsured expenses over $100 for a single illness or condition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a name="SP;7952000083371"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;(2) "Extraordinary medical expenses" includes uninsured, reasonable, and necessary costs for orthodontia, dental treatment, asthma treatment, physical therapy, treatment for any chronic health problem, and professional counseling or psychiatric therapy for diagnosed mental disorders.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Additionally, just to mention the list of added cost in &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;determining&lt;/span&gt; the child support amount also include actual child care expenses incurred due to either parent's employment, FL § 12-204(g); &lt;a name="SearchTerm"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a name="SR;7239"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;extraordinary &lt;a name="SR;7240"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;medical &lt;a name="SR;7241"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;expenses, FL § 12-204(h); special or private school expenses, FL § 12-204(i)(1); expenses for transportation of the child between the parents' homes, FL § 12-204(i)(2); expenses related to medical support, FL § 12-101(d); and a requirement that a parent include the child in that parent's health insurance coverage, FL § 12-102(b). That is the extent of payments that are child support, or are in the nature of child support, under Maryland law.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-4998995148665293482?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com' title='Divorce in Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/4998995148665293482/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=4998995148665293482' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/4998995148665293482'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/4998995148665293482'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2008/08/divorce-in-maryland.html' title='Divorce in Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-1589209174605032933</id><published>2008-08-06T06:49:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-06T06:56:06.426-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Divorce in Maryland'/><title type='text'>Divorce In Maryland The Finite List of Issues</title><content type='html'>Divorce in Maryland revolves around a finite list of issues to be &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;resolved&lt;/span&gt;. The issues can be resolved by agreement between the parties or if the parties can not agree then the court will decide the issues for the parties. I have outlined in brief the list of issues. You can &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;following&lt;/span&gt; the links to more detailed information or if you &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;prefer&lt;/span&gt; you can call my office. We will discuss the issues over the phone at not cost to you.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Venue.htm"&gt;Jurisdiction and Venue&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Divorce%20Grounds.htm"&gt;Grounds for Divorce&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Dv%20Custody%20Taylor.htm"&gt;Child Custody&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Dv%20Custody%20Taylor.htm"&gt;Visitation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/DV%20Child%20Support.htm"&gt;Child Support&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Use%20and%20Possession.html"&gt;Use and Possession&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Dv%20Fees%20and%20Contrib.htm"&gt;Contribution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Divorce%20Alimony.htm"&gt;Alimony&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Marital%20Property.htm"&gt;Marital Property&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Marital Debt&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Dv%20Fees%20and%20Contrib.htm"&gt;Attorney Fees&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Suit Money&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-1589209174605032933?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/' title='Divorce In Maryland The Finite List of Issues'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/1589209174605032933/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=1589209174605032933' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/1589209174605032933'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/1589209174605032933'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2008/08/divorce-in-maryland-finite-list-of.html' title='Divorce In Maryland The Finite List of Issues'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-8762680471489899339</id><published>2008-08-04T15:49:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-16T06:21:46.854-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Alimony'/><title type='text'>Marriage Type Relationship Affecting Alimony in a Maryland Divorce</title><content type='html'>As we see in &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;Whittington&lt;/span&gt; v. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;Whittington&lt;/span&gt; 172 Md.App. 317, 914 A.2d 212 Md.App.,2007 living in &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;marriage&lt;/span&gt; type &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;relationship&lt;/span&gt; is a factor the court can &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;consider&lt;/span&gt; in modifying a post divorce award of alimony to the financially dependant spouse. So how does the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;Maryland&lt;/span&gt; divorce court define marriage type relationship see Fisher v. Fisher75 Md.App. 193, 540 A.2d 1165Md.App.,1988 although there is obviously no single mold into which all marriages (and therefore all “marriage-type relationships”) will fit, we think that the term envisions at least the normally accepted attributes of a marriage-a common residence which each party regards as his or her home, a common household to which each contributes, and a personal relationship that is more than casual and has significant meaning to each. These things are measured, of course, by living arrangements, by shared assets and expenses, and by how the parties and the community view their relationship.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-8762680471489899339?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://yourmarylandlawyer.com' title='Marriage Type Relationship Affecting Alimony in a Maryland Divorce'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/8762680471489899339/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=8762680471489899339' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/8762680471489899339'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/8762680471489899339'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2008/08/as-we-see-in-whittington-v.html' title='Marriage Type Relationship Affecting Alimony in a Maryland Divorce'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-7137054546858987765</id><published>2008-08-04T14:30:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-04T15:04:33.251-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Alimony'/><title type='text'>Indefinite Alimony In a Maryland Divorce</title><content type='html'>Does a marriage type relationship outside and during the marriage as well as post divorce affect the alimony payment? The Maryland courts had stated that circumstance is a factor for &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt; court to consider in awarding alimony and presumably continuing alimony post divorce see Whittington v. Whittington 172 Md.App. 317, 914 A.2d 212 Md.App.,2007.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By way of history the essential purpose of alimony was changed with the adoption of the Maryland Alimony Act in 1980. The principal function of alimony once had been maintenance of the dependent spouse's standard of living. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;However&lt;/span&gt;, when the Act was passed that function became rehabilitation of the economically dependent spouse. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Karmand&lt;/span&gt; v. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Karmand&lt;/span&gt;, 145 Md.App. 317, 327, 802 A.2d 1106 (2002). As such the law generally favors fixed-term or so-called rehabilitative alimony,’ rather than indefinite alimony.” &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;Simonds&lt;/span&gt; v. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;Simonds&lt;/span&gt;, 165 Md.App. 591, 605, 886 A.2d 158 (2005)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There are of course exceptions to favoring fixed alimony. They are found in section 11-106(c) of the Family Law Article. First, the court has discretion to award indefinite alimony if, “due to age, illness, infirmity, or disability, the party seeking alimony cannot reasonably be expected to make substantial progress toward becoming self-supporting. And second, the court may award indefinite alimony upon a finding that, “even after the party seeking alimony will have &lt;a name="sp_162_224"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a name="SDU_224"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a name="citeas((Cite_as:_172_Md.App._317,_*337,_"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;made as much progress toward becoming self-supporting as can reasonably be expected, the respective standards of living of the parties will be unconscionably disparate.”&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Under the Alimony Act, an award of alimony ceases, automatically, upon the remarriage of the recipient. However, the Act does not provide that alimony cannot be awarded, or, if awarded, terminates, or must be terminated, if the recipient lives in a “marriage type relationship”&lt;a name="sp_537_342"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a name="SDU_342"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a name="citeas((Cite_as:_172_Md.App._317,_*342,_"&gt;&lt;/a&gt; with another person.&lt;a name="FN10"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a name="F010102011109526"&gt;&lt;/a&gt; That circumstance is relevant according to the Whittington  court as a consideration of the financial status of the party requesting the award. Additionally it also is relevant to whether the post-divorce disparity in the parties' standards of living is or is not conscionable.&lt;a name="FN11"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a name="F011112011109526"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-7137054546858987765?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/' title='Indefinite Alimony In a Maryland Divorce'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/7137054546858987765/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=7137054546858987765' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7137054546858987765'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7137054546858987765'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2008/08/indefinite-alimony-in-maryland-divorce.html' title='Indefinite Alimony In a Maryland Divorce'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-8342969252729062563</id><published>2008-07-21T07:35:00.005-05:00</published><updated>2008-07-21T08:03:18.849-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Custody'/><title type='text'>Divorce In Maryland. Can I Force My Spouse Out of the House?</title><content type='html'>I receive maybe 25 calls a week on this subject. The answer is maybe and it depends.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If there is an act of violence or the threat of &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;violence&lt;/span&gt;, then yes you can force your spouse out of the house under the Maryland Domestic Violence &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;Statue&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also, obviously the answer is yes if your spouse simply agrees to leave.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, will Maryland law order your spouse from the home, absent violence. The answer &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;appears&lt;/span&gt; to be no. Assume you have a spouse and a minor child. Your spouse will not leave. What can you do to get them out of the house? Will &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Maryland&lt;/span&gt; Divorce law help you in this situation? In a typical custody battle, the court can award use and possession when the parties are separated. This use and possession order will keep your spouse out of the home. However if the spouse refuses to leave then what? It is true that parties can pursue a limited divorce in Maryland based upon constructive desertion and still live under the same roof. This is a recent and some what dramatic change of position for the courts in Maryland. See &lt;a href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/DV%20Grd%20Ricketts.htm"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;Ricketts&lt;/span&gt; v &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;Ricketts&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. Oddly Maryland Family Law Article 5-203 states the court does not have the power to award custody to either party when the parties are not separated. This was addressed by the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;Ricketts&lt;/span&gt; court and it was determined that 5-203 must be read in conjunction with § 1-201(a) and (b). The ultimate conclusion of the court is the trial court, in short, has the jurisdiction and power to determine the custody, visitation, and support even when the parties continue to live together. You will note &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;Ricketts&lt;/span&gt; did not mention the right to order &lt;a href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Use%20and%20Possession.html"&gt;use and possession&lt;/a&gt;. As such the court will grant you custody and support but still will not order your spouse out. This decision makes sense when you realize Maryland public policy as reflected in Maryland divorce law wants marriages to survive and families to stay together.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-8342969252729062563?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Dv%20Custody%20Taylor.htm' title='Divorce In Maryland. Can I Force My Spouse Out of the House?'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/8342969252729062563/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=8342969252729062563' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/8342969252729062563'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/8342969252729062563'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2008/07/divorce-in-maryland-can-i-force-my.html' title='Divorce In Maryland. Can I Force My Spouse Out of the House?'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-5483814098998861692</id><published>2008-07-18T05:31:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2008-07-18T05:52:25.520-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Custody'/><title type='text'>Child Custody Factors in Maryland Divorce</title><content type='html'>As we know custody in a Maryland Divorce occurs on two different levels. There is legal custody and physical custody. Before a judge makes a determination as to what is in the child's best interest the judge will consider a number of factors on both of these issues. As to physical custody: The factors a judge considers as to physical custody are as follows:1) fitness of the parents; 2) character and reputation of the parties; 3) desire of the natural parents and agreements between the parties, 4) potentiality of maintaining natural family relations, 5) preference of the child, 6) material opportunities affecting the future life of the child; 7) age, health and sex of the child; 8) residences of parents and opportunity for visitation; 9) length of separation from the natural parents; and 10) prior voluntary abandonment or surrender.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the court considers all the above factors, it will generally not weigh any one to the exclusion of all others. The court should examine the totality of the situation in the alternative environments and avoid focusing on any single factor such as the financial situation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In my experience the judge will reward reasonable behavior by a parent in promoting the relationship between the child and the otherwise non custodial parent. Oddly the best way to win the war is not to battle. That does not mean go to war unprepared. And this does not apply to every case. There are circumstances where a parent actually does cause harm to the child. In this case there must be contact that is controlled. However, you must think in terms of what is best for the child. Understand judges generally believe that a child benefits from both parents being involved in their lives. The party that promotes relationships and encourages contact, tempered by reasonable decision making, is far ahead in the custody battle.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-5483814098998861692?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/5483814098998861692/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=5483814098998861692' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/5483814098998861692'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/5483814098998861692'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2008/07/child-custody-factors-in-maryland.html' title='Child Custody Factors in Maryland Divorce'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-4120455153567858150</id><published>2008-07-15T07:17:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-16T06:22:18.145-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Custody'/><title type='text'>Child Custody in a Maryland Divorce</title><content type='html'>Maryland Child Custody Law revolves around the simple concept of what is in the child's best interest. Custody happens on two different levels, which are themselves further broken down into two levels. You have Legal Custody, further broken into sole and joint, and you have Physical Custody, further broken into &lt;a href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/DV%20Cust%20Sanders.htm"&gt;sole&lt;/a&gt; and shared. It is interesting to note that the Court in Maryland can not enter an order for &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;pendente&lt;/span&gt; lite custody when the parties continue to reside together. See Maryland Family Law Article 5-203.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Legal Custody: Sole Legal Custody and Joint Legal Custody.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sole Legal Custody is where only the custodial parent has the right to make the decisions affecting health, education and welfare.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Joint Legal Custody is where both parents share equally in decision affecting the health, education and welfare of the minor child.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Physical Custody is where the child lives. Physical Custody is also broken down into two different categories. You have either Sole Physical Custody or Shared Physical Custody. Once a non custodial parent enjoys Shared Physical Custody it means two things (1) he/she has the child with them in excess of 128 over nights per year and (2) the child support obligation is affected by the overnights with the otherwise non custodial parent. You will find many people fight over the 128 overnights. In order for a non custodial parent to reach the 128 number they must establish it is in the child's best interest.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please feel free to call me to discuss your custody case. I am more then happy to talk with you over the phone at no cost to you and answer any questions you may have regarding a divorce in Maryland. 1-888-760-7339.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-4120455153567858150?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Dv%20Custody%20Taylor.htm' title='Child Custody in a Maryland Divorce'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/4120455153567858150/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=4120455153567858150' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/4120455153567858150'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/4120455153567858150'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2008/07/divorce-in-maryland-shared-physical.html' title='Child Custody in a Maryland Divorce'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-8024240955610084904</id><published>2008-07-14T12:53:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-16T06:22:41.725-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Alimony'/><title type='text'>Alimony in maryland divorce</title><content type='html'>Alimony may be obtained in: (1) Complaint for Support; (2) Limited Divorce; or (3) Absolute Divorce.&lt;br /&gt;Alimony can be: (1) &lt;a style="COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; text-underline: single" href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Divorce%20Alimony%20Pendete%20Lite.htm"&gt;Temporary&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a style="COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; text-underline: single" href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Divorce%20Alimony%20Pendete%20Lite.htm"&gt;;&lt;/a&gt; (2) &lt;a style="COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; text-underline: single" href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Divorce%20Alimony%20Rehab.htm"&gt;Rehabilitative&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a style="COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; text-underline: single" href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Divorce%20Alimony%20Rehab.htm"&gt;;&lt;/a&gt; or (3) &lt;a style="COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; text-underline: single" href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Divorce%20Alimony%20Indef.htm"&gt;Indefinite&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a style="COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; text-underline: single" href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Divorce%20Alimony%20Indef.htm"&gt;.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a style="COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; text-underline: single" href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Divorce%20Alimony%20Indef.htm"&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Alimony is subject to modification if: (1) a separation agreement does not say it is “not subject to modification” and (2) it is awarded and the party seeking to modify does so during the term of the alimony and can show a material change of circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;For many years alimony was awarded only to a wife, but Family Law § 11-101(b) now provides, "The court may award alimony to either party." This change in language was in accordance with the Equal Rights Amendment, adopted in 1972. In Bricker v. Bricker, the court used the descriptive designations "economically dependent spouse" and "economically independent spouse" to identify the parties. Following tentative beginnings, alimony law has developed with alarming speed. By the late 1970s the case law had exploded. The aim of an alimony award was to assure suitable maintenance for the economically dependent spouse.&lt;br /&gt;The courts established factors to be considered in making awards.&lt;br /&gt;FACTORS:&lt;br /&gt;(1) the ability of the party seeking alimony to be wholly or partly self-supporting;&lt;br /&gt;(2) the time necessary for the party seeking alimony to gain sufficient education or training to enable that party to find suitable employment;&lt;br /&gt;(3) the standard of living that the parties established during their marriage;&lt;br /&gt;(4) the duration of the marriage;&lt;br /&gt;(5) the contributions, monetary and nonmonetary, of each party to the well-being of the family;&lt;br /&gt;(6) the circumstances that contributed to the estrangement of the parties; (see Caccamise 747 A.2d 221 Trial court, in the exercise of its judgment, after considering statutory factors, may award alimony to the "guilty" party).&lt;br /&gt;(7) the age of each party;&lt;br /&gt;(8) the physical and mental condition of each party;&lt;br /&gt;(9) the ability of the party from whom alimony is sought to meet that party's needs while meeting the needs of the party seeking alimony;&lt;br /&gt;(10) any agreement between the parties;&lt;br /&gt;(11) the financial needs and financial resources of each party, including:&lt;br /&gt;(i) all income and assets, including property that does not produce income; (ii) any award made under §§ 8-205 and 8-208 of this article; (iii) the nature and amount of the financial obligations of each party; and (iv) the right of each party to receive retirement benefits; and&lt;br /&gt;(12) whether the award would cause a spouse who is a resident of a related institution as defined in § 19-301 of the Health - General Article and from whom alimony is sought to become eligible for medical assistance earlier than would otherwise occur.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-8024240955610084904?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/' title='Alimony in maryland divorce'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/8024240955610084904/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=8024240955610084904' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/8024240955610084904'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/8024240955610084904'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2008/07/adultery-in-maryland-divorce.html' title='Alimony in maryland divorce'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-2836078186243411849</id><published>2008-07-01T05:45:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-16T06:23:12.140-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Counsel Fees'/><title type='text'>Divorce in Maryland Claiming Counsel Fees</title><content type='html'>As part of your claim for relief in any contested divorce case you generally always ask the court to award your client counsel fees. I believe this builds in an element of pressure on the other side to force reasonable conduct. Also, there is the obvious need and justification in many cases. So what is the basis for the court to award counsel fees?. You will find the statutory &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;authority&lt;/span&gt; in the Family Law Articles at sections 7-107 also 8-214 and again at 11-110. It is necessary to prove two elements to pursue the fees award. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;Specifically: &lt;/span&gt;(1) the financial resources and financial needs of both parties; and (2) whether there was substantial justification for prosecuting or defending the proceeding.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-2836078186243411849?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/' title='Divorce in Maryland Claiming Counsel Fees'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/2836078186243411849/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=2836078186243411849' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/2836078186243411849'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/2836078186243411849'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2008/07/divorce-in-maryland-claiming-counsel.html' title='Divorce in Maryland Claiming Counsel Fees'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-7177960523172718050</id><published>2008-06-27T09:24:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-16T06:23:36.062-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Divorce in Maryland Private School and Child Support</title><content type='html'>Maryland child support is based upon mandatory &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;guidelines&lt;/span&gt;. factors that are considered in determining the amount of child support, include but are not limited to, cost incurred in private school education. Whether this cost should or should not be considered in &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt; child support calculation depends upon the parties agreement or if the parties can not agree, then the court's order. As such the court looks at a &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;number&lt;/span&gt; of factors to determine if the private school tuition should be made a part of &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt; child support calculations. The factors can be found in the case of Witt v. Ristaino, 118 Md.App. 155, 701 A.2d 1227 (1997). These &lt;a name="SR;13367"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;factors include (1) “the child's educational history,” (2) “the child's performance while in the private school,” (3) “ family history,” (4) “whether the parents had made the choice to send the child to the school prior to their divorce,” (5) “any particular factor that may exist in a specific case that might impact upon the child's best interests,” and (6) “the parent's ability to pay for the schooling.”&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-7177960523172718050?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/' title='Divorce in Maryland Private School and Child Support'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/7177960523172718050/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=7177960523172718050' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7177960523172718050'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7177960523172718050'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2008/06/divorce-in-maryland-private-school-and.html' title='Divorce in Maryland Private School and Child Support'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-448233347881408837</id><published>2008-06-24T05:52:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-16T06:24:05.439-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Custody'/><title type='text'>Maryland Child Custody Law</title><content type='html'>Maryland Child Custody Law revolves around the simple concept of what is in the child's best interest. Custody happens on two different levels, which are themselves further broken down into two levels. You have Legal Custody, further broken into sole and joint, and you have Physical Custody, further broken into sole and shared. It is interesting to note that the Court in Maryland can not enter an order for pendente lite custody when the parties continue to reside together. See Maryland Family Law Article 5-203.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Legal Custody: Sole Legal Custody and Joint Legal Custody. Sole Legal Custody is where only the custodial parent has the right to make the decisions affecting health, education and welfare. Joint Legal Custody is where both parents share equally in decision affecting the health, education and welfare of the minor child.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Physical Custody is more interesting then legal Custody. Physical Custody is where the child lives. Physical Custody is also broken down into two different categories. You have either Sole Physical Custody or Shared Physical Custody. Once a non custodial parent enjoys Shared Physical Custody it means two things (1) he/she has the child with them in excess of 128 over nights per year and (2) the child support obligation is affected by the overnights with the otherwise non custodial parent. You will find many people fight over the 128 overnights. In order for a non custodial parent to reach the 128 number they must establish it is in the child's best interest. The court looks at the factors in a case call Taylor v Taylor to help the judge make the difficult decisions on whether to order sole joint custody or shared physical custody.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-448233347881408837?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Dv%20Custody%20Taylor.htm' title='Maryland Child Custody Law'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/448233347881408837/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=448233347881408837' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/448233347881408837'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/448233347881408837'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2008/06/maryland-child-custody-law.html' title='Maryland Child Custody Law'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-4437373332769064853</id><published>2008-06-23T10:23:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-16T06:25:08.716-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Divorce in Maryland'/><title type='text'>Divorce In Maryland</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;In any divorce in Maryland there are a finite list of issues to be resolved. The issues can be resolved by agreement or the issues can be decided by court order. If you would like to learn more about each of the issues Please feel free to call me. I am happy to discuss the divorce process in Maryland, over the phone at no cost to you. I have outlined the list of issues below for your review. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;Jurisdiction and Venue&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;Grounds for Divorce&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;Child Custody&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;Visitation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;Child Support&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;Contribution&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;Alimony&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;Marital Property&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;Marital Debt&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;Counsel Fees&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;Suit Money&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-4437373332769064853?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/' title='Divorce In Maryland'/><link rel='enclosure' type='' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/' length='0'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/4437373332769064853/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=4437373332769064853' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/4437373332769064853'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/4437373332769064853'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2008/06/divorce-in-maryland.html' title='Divorce In Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-7976937965160541861</id><published>2008-06-21T13:20:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-16T06:25:39.586-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Marital Property'/><title type='text'>Gifts and Pre-Marital Assets As Marital Property</title><content type='html'>The Marital Property Act” (“Act”). Section 8-201 defines marital property:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(e)(1) “Marital property” means the property, however titled, acquired by 1 or both parties during the marriage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(2) “Marital property” includes any interest in real property held by the parties as tenants by the entirety unless the real property is excluded by valid agreement.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(3) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subsection, “marital property” does not include property:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(i) acquired before the marriage;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(ii) acquired by inheritance or gift from a third party;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(iii) excluded by valid agreement; or&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(iv) directly traceable to any of these sources.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So what about an asset that appreciated during marriage but was acquired by gift or was pre-marital then can the other non owner spouse share in the post marriage appreciation as marital property. Well maybe yes. If either spouse used their efforts to help the asset gain value during marriage, then certainly yes it is marital property. However the value is marital property only to the extent you can prove the efforts produced the specific value. At least as it relates to stocks since it appears not to relate to trailer parks. Additionally or otherwise if the owner spouse was able to re-invest post marriage appreciation, such as for example dividends, from the assets then yes again as long as the non owner spouse can prove they maintained the household expenses which permitted the re-investment. But you can not share if the post marriage appreciation was purely passive. Meaning the assets gained value with no help from anyone or with out reinvestment of money otherwise needed and available to the owner spouse. For more information feel free to call my office or visit http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-7976937965160541861?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/' title='Gifts and Pre-Marital Assets As Marital Property'/><link rel='enclosure' type='' href='http://www.yourmarylanddivorcelawyer.com' length='0'/><link rel='enclosure' type='' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com' length='0'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/7976937965160541861/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=7976937965160541861' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7976937965160541861'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/7976937965160541861'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2008/06/gifts-and-pre-marital-assets-as-marital.html' title='Gifts and Pre-Marital Assets As Marital Property'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-1183425197690488815</id><published>2007-07-14T07:40:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-16T06:26:28.359-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Support'/><title type='text'>Child Custody Affecting the Child Support Some Tips</title><content type='html'>As we know already custody happens on multiple levels. You have &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;legal&lt;/span&gt; custody which is sole or joint and y&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;ou&lt;/span&gt; have physical custody which is either sole or shared. Legal &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;custody&lt;/span&gt; only affects decision making on issues of health, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;education&lt;/span&gt; a&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;nd&lt;/span&gt; welfare of &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt; child. Physical &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;custody&lt;/span&gt; is sole until such time as the non &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;custodial&lt;/span&gt; parent has 128 overnights each year when the child is with them. At this point the custody is shared and the child support is thrown into a different &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;mathematical&lt;/span&gt; formula for &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"&gt;determining&lt;/span&gt; the amount to be paid by the non custodial &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10"&gt;spouse&lt;/span&gt;. The effect can be significant in &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11"&gt;reducing&lt;/span&gt; the child support payment. Many &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12"&gt;people&lt;/span&gt; fight in court for the 128. Generally, you can get the 128 with the following &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"&gt;visitation&lt;/span&gt; schedule. Friday &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14"&gt;thru&lt;/span&gt; Monday morning and two over nights each week. Not easy to do when kids are in school. If that is your situation, then try to pick up the time on school breaks, holidays and during the summer. A major factor the court will look at on this issue is the ability of the parties to communicate. The court looks at the history of communication both before and after the separation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Copy Right 2007 &lt;a style="TEXT-DECORATION: none" href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/index.html"&gt;Your Maryland Lawyer&lt;/a&gt; and M&lt;a style="TEXT-DECORATION: none" href="http://www.yourmarylanddivorcelawyer.com/"&gt;aryland Divorce Lawyer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-1183425197690488815?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylanddivorcelawyer.com' title='Child Custody Affecting the Child Support Some Tips'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/1183425197690488815/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=1183425197690488815' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/1183425197690488815'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/1183425197690488815'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2007/07/child-custody-affecting-child-support.html' title='Child Custody Affecting the Child Support Some Tips'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-864610069990705542</id><published>2007-06-29T06:47:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-16T06:27:01.991-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Grounds for Divorce'/><title type='text'>Adultery and Proof</title><content type='html'>I received a call yesterday from a women who wanted a quick divorce. Her husband was willing to admit his adultery and that was the only proof she had. They were prepared with a settlement agreement and now wanted the divorce after only a three week separation. Her question "Can I file now and get the divorce?" Her answer like so many others, maybe. But in this case probably not. In Maryland to divorce on adultery you need to prove predisposition (public affection, generally) and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;opportunity&lt;/span&gt; (lovers in seclusion for a &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;sufficient&lt;/span&gt; period of time to do the act). You can get the divorce on the offending parties admission (I did it), only when the case is &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;hotly&lt;/span&gt; contested. The admission is evidence in every case. But grounds must be &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;corroborated&lt;/span&gt;. An admission such as this can not be the only evidence of the grounds unless the case is hotly contested. In her situation the case was not contested at all. In fact everyone was in agreement and even had the separation agreement signed to prove it. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;Unfortunately&lt;/span&gt; she would have to wait the one year.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-864610069990705542?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Divorce%20Grounds.htm' title='Adultery and Proof'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/864610069990705542/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=864610069990705542' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/864610069990705542'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/864610069990705542'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2007/06/adultery-and-proof.html' title='Adultery and Proof'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-3461030661302464205</id><published>2007-05-31T06:50:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-16T06:27:29.348-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Marital Property'/><title type='text'>When Dissipation Ain't</title><content type='html'>A very interesting case in Maryland Divorce law that addressed &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;among&lt;/span&gt; other issues the matter of a party using marital property, in this case the husband's 401k to pay his counsel fees. As events unfolded in this case the husband actually used the 401k proceeds to pay his &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;counsel&lt;/span&gt; fees and a portion of his wife's counsel fees as ordered by the court. The Maryland court determined that the use of marital property to pay reasonable and necessary counsel fees is not a dissipation of marital assets. As such tell your client from now on to stop paying you with their credit cards and start paying you from marital assets. The net effect is the other spouse is also paying you. See Allison v. Allison 160 Md.App. 331, 864 A.2d 191.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-3461030661302464205?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/MP%20Discipation.htm' title='When Dissipation Ain&apos;t'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/3461030661302464205/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=3461030661302464205' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3461030661302464205'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3461030661302464205'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2007/05/when-dissipation-aint.html' title='When Dissipation Ain&apos;t'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-8538814459313851993</id><published>2007-05-30T16:08:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-16T06:28:11.903-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Divorce in Maryland'/><title type='text'>All Is Well That Ends</title><content type='html'>I told you I would follow up on &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;domestic&lt;/span&gt; violence hearing results that had me working on Memorial Day. We won as expected. The case was in the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;District&lt;/span&gt; Court for Baltimore County. The counsel on the other side of the issue attributed the results to &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt; pick of the judge. But I believe any judge would have seen it the way I did. A bruise, the size of a dime, on a 2 year old with no indication of how the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;bruise&lt;/span&gt; got there. As the judge said if everytime one of my kids got a bruise I was investigated by CPS my kids would have been taken away from me. I have some good stuff on my webpage on DV and children testifying. &lt;a href="http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Dom%20Violence.htm"&gt;http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Dom%20Violence.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-8538814459313851993?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/Dom%20Violence.htm' title='All Is Well That Ends'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/8538814459313851993/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=8538814459313851993' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/8538814459313851993'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/8538814459313851993'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2007/05/all-is-well-that-ends.html' title='All Is Well That Ends'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-8817110805927974143</id><published>2007-05-29T05:59:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-16T06:28:32.077-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Divorce in Maryland'/><title type='text'>It Ain't a Chore If It's Fun Hun</title><content type='html'>Hello Everyone. I trust you enjoyed the Memorial Day weekend and everyone is safe. I worked most of the day on Memorial Day to prepare for a &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;domestic&lt;/span&gt; violence trial on Tuesday morning. This is a case that justice demands I win. Don't worry &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;about&lt;/span&gt; my domestic life. I cooked chicken and ribs on Sunday and had a great time with my family around the pool. However, I simply can not sit by and watch as someone tries to use our system of justice as a tool to gain &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;advantage&lt;/span&gt; in a custody battle. So I put in the extra time on Monday. Besides all I missed at home was cutting the grass. My Domestic violence case involves a 2 year old child that the x husband claims is being abused by the x wife, my client, since he noticed a bruise on the child's thigh. Yep a bruise the size of a dime on the child's thigh. He admits in his &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;petition&lt;/span&gt; he has no idea how the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;bruise&lt;/span&gt; got there, only that is appeared when the child was with the mom. I am sure the case will take about 2 or 3 hours in trial. This is now the second domestic violence petition from &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt; same x husband against the same x wife. The first one as dismissed on &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt; day of trial. I'll let you know how it turns out. Stay tuned.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-8817110805927974143?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylanddivorcelawyer.com' title='It Ain&apos;t a Chore If It&apos;s Fun Hun'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/8817110805927974143/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=8817110805927974143' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/8817110805927974143'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/8817110805927974143'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2007/05/it-aint-chore-if-its-fun-hun.html' title='It Ain&apos;t a Chore If It&apos;s Fun Hun'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-1470139516607488839</id><published>2007-05-26T08:09:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-16T06:29:08.358-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Child Custody'/><title type='text'>Uniform Child Custody Act</title><content type='html'>I have been receiving a lot of calls lately on the subject of one parent leaving the state, Maryland, and relocating in another state with the kids. The questions generally revolve around what state will not have &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;jurisdiction&lt;/span&gt; over the custody issues. As life has &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;unfolded&lt;/span&gt; the states have adopted the Uniform Child Custody Act. Essentially the act says the state where the kids have lived for &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt; 6 months immedicately prior to the filing of a &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;petition&lt;/span&gt; on &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt; issue of custody and visitation will be the state that has &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;jurisdiction&lt;/span&gt;. The law makers figure this makes sense since that is the state where all &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;witnesses&lt;/span&gt; and evidence will be generally.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-1470139516607488839?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com' title='Uniform Child Custody Act'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/1470139516607488839/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=1470139516607488839' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/1470139516607488839'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/1470139516607488839'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2007/05/uniform-child-custody-act.html' title='Uniform Child Custody Act'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-3362327534126615301</id><published>2007-05-22T09:54:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-16T06:29:31.665-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Marital Property'/><title type='text'>Pre-Marital Financial Contribution to Real Property</title><content type='html'>Normally Maryland is a &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;Source&lt;/span&gt; of &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt; Funds Theory &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;state&lt;/span&gt;. Meaning if you had &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;pre&lt;/span&gt;-marital money and used it to purchase marital assets, you could get a return of your non-marital investment. This all changes when you are involved in real &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;property&lt;/span&gt; that is owed &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;tenants&lt;/span&gt; by the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;entirety's&lt;/span&gt;. In this case all the money is &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;marital&lt;/span&gt; no matter where the funds originated, and you have to argue for an equitable distribution of the non-marital money. See Gordon v Gordon. This is a subtle but important variation.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-3362327534126615301?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com' title='Pre-Marital Financial Contribution to Real Property'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/3362327534126615301/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=3362327534126615301' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3362327534126615301'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3362327534126615301'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2007/05/pre-marital-financial-contribution-to.html' title='Pre-Marital Financial Contribution to Real Property'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-3165179133782961824</id><published>2007-05-21T06:16:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-16T06:30:56.319-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Financial Statements'/><title type='text'>Financial Statements</title><content type='html'>It is often overlooked but could not be more important. I inherited a case from an attorney when her &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;client&lt;/span&gt; became &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;dissatisfied&lt;/span&gt; with her services. When this &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;gentlemen&lt;/span&gt; came to my office he was days before the hearing on &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;pendente&lt;/span&gt; lite issues. The &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;financial&lt;/span&gt; statement the former attorney had assisted in preparing was inaccurate in terms of expenses and income. For this particular client the impact could have been &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;devastating&lt;/span&gt; as he is self employed. The monthly income &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;identified&lt;/span&gt; by the former attorney had the client earning $10,000.00 a month. When in fact that figure accounted in large part for payment of his over head cost for the business. You must be extremely causious with financial statements. They are evidence in each case. Be sure the numbers are accurate and verified.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-3165179133782961824?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/' title='Financial Statements'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/3165179133782961824/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=3165179133782961824' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3165179133782961824'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/3165179133782961824'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2007/05/financial-statements.html' title='Financial Statements'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-115451997525150905</id><published>2006-08-02T06:57:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-16T06:31:21.205-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Grounds for Divorce'/><title type='text'>Amazing New Developement</title><content type='html'>Case: Robert M. Ricketts Jr. v. Mary C. Ricketts, CA No. 136. Opinion byBell, C. J. Filed July 28, 2006. Issue: Can a husband maintain an action fora limited divorce based on constructive desertion based on lack of maritalrelations where the parties continue to live under the same roof, inseparate bedrooms and without cohabitation? May a complaint for custody andvisitation be maintained?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Holding: Yes; judgment reversed and case remanded.The circuit court should not have dismissed the husband's complaint, asconstructive desertion may occur where both parties continue to live underthe same roof. Further, the circuit court has jurisdiction and power todetermine the custody, visitation and support of the children. Counsel:Richard D. Rosenthal for appellant; William P. Englehart Jr. for appellee.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is a significant departure in Maryland Divorce cases as generally most judges will not entertain a hearing on limited divorce when the parties are still under the same roof. Now according to this case Maryland Judges can entertain the limited divorce when constructive desertion is the grounds.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-115451997525150905?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/' title='Amazing New Developement'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/115451997525150905/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=115451997525150905' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/115451997525150905'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/115451997525150905'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2006/08/amazing-new-developement.html' title='Amazing New Developement'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29052382.post-114955366485384922</id><published>2006-06-05T19:25:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-16T06:31:39.235-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Alimony'/><title type='text'>Alimony In Maryland</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-family:times new roman;"&gt;Alimony: The claim for &lt;a href="http://www.bartnik-law.com/Div%20alimony.htm"&gt;alimony&lt;/a&gt; is based upon financial need of the party requesting alimony and the financial ability of the other party to pay. Alimony can be either &lt;a href="http://www.bartnik-law.com/Div%20alimony_pendente_lite.htm"&gt;temporary,&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.bartnik-law.com/Div%20rehabilitative_alimony.htm"&gt;permanent&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href="http://www.bartnik-law.com/Div%20Alimony%20Indef.htm"&gt;indefinite&lt;/a&gt;. Typically, in Maryland the Court's will award alimony as rehabilitative alimony. This means the award will be designed to give the non-financially dominant spouse some amount of money for a specific period of time in an effort to allow that spouse to make the adjustment from married to single.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/29052382-114955366485384922?l=keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='related' href='http://www.yourmarylandlawyer.com/' title='Alimony In Maryland'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/feeds/114955366485384922/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=29052382&amp;postID=114955366485384922' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/114955366485384922'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/29052382/posts/default/114955366485384922'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://keithblairbartnikpa.blogspot.com/2006/06/alimony-in-maryland.html' title='Alimony In Maryland'/><author><name>Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06210044014297793175</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
